Effect of Pump Rate Penetration Sensitivity on Hydraulic Fracturing in Low Resistivity Reservoir
Petroleum Science and Engineering
Volume 3, Issue 1, June 2019, Pages: 10-16
Received: Feb. 19, 2019;
Accepted: Mar. 26, 2019;
Published: Apr. 18, 2019
Views 66 Downloads 24
Harry Budiharjo Sulistyarso, Department of Petroleum Engineering, UPN “Veteran” Yogyakarta, D. I. Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia Indonesia
Hydraulic fracturing is one of the stimulation methods to increase rock permeability. Hydraulic fracturing is commonly used in reservoir that have low permeability and wells which have a decline in production rate. In many cases, hydraulic fracturing show significant success which is marked by an increase in the production rates. In this paper, hydraulic fracturing will be conducted by observing the effects of pumping rates. A case example is taken from an oil well that has a low resistivity reservoir, which is HAP#532 well. This low resistivity causes the reservoir to have low permeability and small production rates. The scenario of hydraulic fracturing in HAP#532 well is done by using several different pumping rate sensitivity, start from 10 BPM, 20 BPM, and 30 BPM, as based on 15 BPM base case pumping rates to obtain the most optimal pumping rate. Therefore, it can be seen how much the effect of pumping rates on hydraulic fracturing. From three scenarios performed by using FracCADE and Prosper, author get the optimal pumping rate is 20 BPM. At this pumping rate, the fracture geometry obtained fracture half-length (Xf) is 213 ft, fracture height (hf) is 45.6 ft, fracture width (Wavg) is 0.56 inch, average permeability is 58.09 mD, and the production rate is 348 BOPD.
Harry Budiharjo Sulistyarso,
Effect of Pump Rate Penetration Sensitivity on Hydraulic Fracturing in Low Resistivity Reservoir, Petroleum Science and Engineering.
Vol. 3, No. 1,
2019, pp. 10-16.
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Crain, E. R., (2016). “Crain's Petrophysical Pocket Pal”. Course Reference Manual, Self Published. pp. 2.
Guo, B., Lyons, W., and Ghalambor, Ali,. (2007). “Petroleum Production Engineering a Computer assisted Approach”. Elsevier, pp. 253, 255-257, 260.
Ciezobka J, Maity D, Salehi I., (2016) “Variable pump rate fracturing leads to improved production in the Marcellus Shale”. Society of Petroleum Engineers. SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, Texas, USA. pp. 1-2.
Austin, Boyd., Darling, Halord., Tabanou, Jacques., et all., (1995). “The Lowdown On Low Resistivity Pay”. Oilfield Review Journal, pp. 1-3.
Tucker, M. E., (2003). “Sedimentary Rock in the Field”, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: New York. ISBN: 0-470-85123-6, pp. 88.
Hamada, G., and Al-Awad, M., (2000). “Petrophysical Evaluation of Low Resistivity Sandstone Reservoirs”. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology. Volume 39, No. 7, pp. 1-3.
Worthington, Paul, (1997). “Recognition and Development of Low-Resistivity Pay”. SPE Asia Pasific Oil and Gas Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, April 14th-16th, 1997. SPE 38035, pp. 3, 8.
Brady, Barry., Elbel, Jack., et all., (1992). “Cracking Rock: Progress in Fracture Treatment Design”. Oilfield Review Journal, pp. 3.
Economides, J. Michael, and Boney, C., (2000). “Reservoir Stimulation in Petroleum Production”, Wiley, New York, pp. 80, 99, 107.
Khair, Elham, (2017). “Effect of Pump Schedule on Fracture Geometry and Shape during Frac Packing Job”. Journal of Petroleum Environmental Biotechnology. Volume 8, Issue 5, DOI: 10.4172/2157-7463.1000342, pp. 3-4.
Economides, J. Michael, and K. Nolte., (1989). “Reservoir Stimulation”, Second Edition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, pp. 186.