Performance Investigation of a Series-Parallel Petrol-Electric Vehicle
Petroleum Science and Engineering
Volume 2, Issue 3, June 2017, Pages: 101-105
Received: Feb. 3, 2017; Accepted: Mar. 3, 2017; Published: May 16, 2017
Views 110      Downloads 6
Authors
C. C. Kwasi-Effah, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria
A. I. Obanor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria
O. O. Ogbeide, Department of Production Engineering, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
The energy savings potential of a 1325kg series-parallel petrol-electric vehicle was evaluated using simulated high way fuel economy test (HWFET) and urban dynamometer driving schedule (UDDS) drive cycle data. Analysis showed that, the average percentage reduction in fuel compared to the most efficient conventional car is approximately 60% combining both cycles. This paper also shows that, the regenerative braking system recovers at least 1% of the energy loss associated with the internal combustion engine in every 1.789km distance of the UDDS drive cycle and 3.756km in the highway drive cycle when compared to the conventional braking system.
Keywords
Series-Parallel, Gasoline-Electric Vehicle, UDDS, HWFET, Internal Combustion Engine, Hybrid, Energy, Appraisal, Efficient, Regenerative Braking
To cite this article
C. C. Kwasi-Effah, A. I. Obanor, O. O. Ogbeide, Performance Investigation of a Series-Parallel Petrol-Electric Vehicle, Petroleum Science and Engineering. Vol. 2, No. 3, 2017, pp. 101-105. doi: 10.11648/j.pse.20170203.17
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
Cacciola R. R and Sarva M. (2010). Adverse respiratory effects and allergic susceptibility in relation to particulate air pollution. Flirting with disaster. Vol. 1(2): 23-25.
[2]
Rob d. J, Max A, and Elisa D. (2009). Overview of current technology and its application in developing and transitional countries. United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP). Available at www. scholar.google.com.
[3]
Utang P. B and Peterside K. S (2011). Spatio-temporal variations in urban vehicular emission in Port Harcourt city, Nigeria. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management Vol. 4 (2): 37-51.
[4]
Yuliang L. Z (2005). Modeling and simulation of hybrid electric vehicles. Technical report, Department of mechanical engineering, University of Victoria.
[5]
Maria G., James E. A. and Timothy J. W (2016) Cost-Effective Vehicle and Fuel Technology Choices in a Carbon-Constrained World: Insights from Global Energy Systems Modeling. Elsevier Electric and Hybrid Vehicles: 18-22.
[6]
Wishart J. D and Dong Z. (2009). Modeling and simulation of two-mode hybrid vehicle architecture. 19th international conference on design theory and methodology USA.
[7]
Ulrich E. and Rittmar H. (2010). Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles, Battery Electric Vehicles, and their Impact on Energy Storage Technologies: An Overview. Elsevier Electric and Hybrid Vehicles: 227-245.
[8]
Timothy E. Lipman and Mark A. Delucchi (2010). Expected Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions by Battery, Fuel Cell, and Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles. Elsevier Electric and Hybrid Vehicles: 113-158.
[9]
Don H. (2012). Extending value-added Ag marketing resource center and fuel economy. Available at www.extension.iastate.edu.
[10]
Sandun K. (2010). Implementation and performance evaluation of a regenerative braking system M. eng thesis. College of Technology, Purdue University.
[11]
Carla Silva and Tiago Farias (2010). Evaluation of Energy Consumption, Emissions, and Costs of Plug-in Hybrid Vehicles. Elsevier Electric and Hybrid Vehicles: 193-210.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
548 FASHION AVENUE
NEW YORK, NY 10018
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-688-8931