Evaluation Minimizes the Way of Shortage of Quantity of Coal Through the Quality Analysis at Customers End
International Journal of Energy and Environmental Science
Volume 2, Issue 4, July 2017, Pages: 73-78
Received: May 18, 2017; Accepted: Jun. 30, 2017; Published: Aug. 1, 2017
Views 1146      Downloads 42
Authors
Bharat Kumar Dey, Department of Chemistry, C. U. Shah University, Wadhwan, India
Keyur D. Bhatt, Department of Chemistry, Ganpat University, Kherva, India
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
The mineral means that coal its differ from the other minerals due to the different properties and heterogeneity character basically coal is divide four category i.e peat, bituminous, lignite and anthracite ‘Coal’ is one of the primary sources of energy accounting for about 80.7% of coal production for the total energy consumption in the country. India has some of the largest reserves of coal in the world. Indian coal has high ash content and low calorific value. However, with the present rate in India where approximately 52% primary commercial energy is coal dependant coal India alone meets to the tune of 40% of primary commercial requirement and commands 74% of the Indian coal market and its feed 82 out of 86 coal based thermal power plants in India, in accounts for 76% of total thermal power generating capacity of the utility sector and supplies coal at price the discounted to international prices, reserves coal likely to last over 90 years. The energy derived from coal in India is about twice that of energy derived from other sources, where energy derived from coal is about higher than energy derived from oil. Country produce electricity using oil, coal solar, wind and they import coal like the country Australia, China, Indonesia &South Africa. The Odisha, West bengal, Assam, Bihar, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, Madhay pradesh, Andhra pradesh, Gujarat and Tamil nadu are the coal reserve states in India. Coals are used regularly for generation of heat but due to globalization the proper assessment both the quality and quantity is most important for modern industry and environmental conservation. In this research we used different instruments and for the spectroscopic analysis used FTIR and ESI-MS and express the difficulties are going on and how it direct impact to economy and environment.
Keywords
Economy, Environment, Logistic Loss, Inflation, Customers
To cite this article
Bharat Kumar Dey, Keyur D. Bhatt, Evaluation Minimizes the Way of Shortage of Quantity of Coal Through the Quality Analysis at Customers End, International Journal of Energy and Environmental Science. Vol. 2, No. 4, 2017, pp. 73-78. doi: 10.11648/j.ijees.20170204.11
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
Churchill EV, Amirkhanian SN. Coal ash utilization in asphalt concrete mixtures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 1999; 11: 295-301.
[2]
Cumpston B, Shadman F, Risbud S. Utilization of coal-ash minerals for technological ceramics. Journal of Materials Science 1992; 27: 1781-4.
[3]
Manz O. Worldwide production of coal ash and utilization in concrete and other products. Fuel 1997; 76: 691-6.
[4]
Siddique R. Utilization of coal combustion by-products in sustainable construction materials. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2010; 54: 1060-6.
[5]
Zhang J, Dong W, Li J, Qiao L, Zheng J, Sheng J. Utilization of coal fly ash in the glass–ceramic production. Journal of hazardous materials 2007; 149: 523-6.
[6]
Ye D, Agnew J, Zhang D. Gasification of a South Australian low-rank coal with carbon dioxide and steam: kinetics and reactivity studies. Fuel 1998; 77: 1209-19.
[7]
Cheng Y-P, YU Q-x. Application of Safe and High-Efficient Exploitation System of Coal and Gas in Coal Seams [J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology 2003; 5: 000.
[8]
Clarkson C, Bustin R. The effect of pore structure and gas pressure upon the transport properties of coal: a laboratory and modeling study. 1. Isotherms and pore volume distributions. Fuel 1999; 78: 1333-44.
[9]
Roca J, Padilla E, Farré M, Galletto V. Economic growth and atmospheric pollution in Spain: discussing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. Ecological Economics 2001; 39: 85-99.
[10]
Clarke LB. The fate of trace elements during coal combustion and gasification: an overview. Fuel 1993; 72: 731-6.
[11]
Buonanno G, Faverio P, Pigni F, Ravarini A, Sciuto D, Tagliavini M. Factors affecting ERP system adoption: A comparative analysis between SMEs and large companies. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 2005; 18: 384-426.
[12]
Badcock B. Making sense of cities: A geographical survey: Routledge; 2014.
[13]
Rose G. Feminism & geography: The limits of geographical knowledge: U of Minnesota Press; 1993.
[14]
Vassilev SV, Vassileva CG. A new approach for the classification of coal fly ashes based on their origin, composition, properties, and behaviour. Fuel 2007; 86: 1490-512.
[15]
Vallyathan V, Goins M, Lapp LN, Pack D, Leonard S, Shi X, et al. Changes in bronchoalveolar lavage indices associated with radiographic classification in coal miners. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 2000; 162: 958-65.
[16]
Lindsay P, Campbell R, Fergusson D, Gillard G, Moore T. Slope stability probability classification, Waikato coal measures, New Zealand. International Journal of Coal Geology 2001; 45: 127-45.
[17]
Minard RD. Race relationships in the Pocahontas coal field. Journal of Social Issues 1952; 8: 29-44.
[18]
Macpherson S, Galvin K. The effect of vibration on dry coal beneficiation in the reflux classifier. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization 2010; 30: 283-94.
[19]
Bhattacharjee S, Ghosh B, Chakraborty N. Renewable energy resource assessment of Tripura for power generation. Journal of Resources, Energy and Development 2008; 5: 69-81.
[20]
Singh G. Assessment of Environmental impacts of overburden dumps in mining areas. The Indian Mining & Engineering Journal 2007; 46: 18-22.
[21]
Lockie S, Franettovich M, Petkova-Timmer V, Rolfe J, Ivanova G. Coal mining and the resource community cycle: a longitudinal assessment of the social impacts of the Coppabella coal mine. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2009; 29: 330-9.
[22]
Chadwick MJ, Highton N, Lindman N. Environmental Impacts of Coal Mining & Utilization: A Complete Revision of Environmental Implications of Expanded Coal Utilization: Elsevier; 2013.
[23]
Zhang Y-J, Da Y-B. The decomposition of energy-related carbon emission and its decoupling with economic growth in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2015; 41: 1255-66.
[24]
Luken RA, Piras S. A critical overview of industrial energy decoupling programs in six developing countries in Asia. Energy policy 2011; 39: 3869-72.
[25]
Bekhet HA, Abdullah A. An examination of the relationship between energy consumption and performance of transportation sector in Malaysia: output multipliers approach. International Journal of Economics and Business Research 2013; 5: 147-64.
[26]
Zhang Y-J, Da Y-B. Decomposing the changes of energy-related carbon emissions in China: evidence from the PDA approach. Natural hazards 2013; 69: 1109.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186