Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering
Volume 3, Issue 2, June 2018, Pages: 27-31
Received: Mar. 4, 2018;
Accepted: Aug. 22, 2018;
Published: Sep. 19, 2018
Views 1154 Downloads 128
Maria Aparecida de Paula Lima, Environmental Engineering, Polytechnic School, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Assed Haddad, Environmental Engineering, Polytechnic School, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
The present study is motivated by the many accidents in process plants that could be avoided or at least attenuated by inherent safety philosophy. The objective of this article is to understand the real constraints to Inherent Safety Philosophy (ISF) application. It contemplated an evaluation of the limitations and difficulties of applying the inherent safety techniques to process plants based on a specific case study in which some the potential risks to the plant were evaluated and some modifications were advised instead. From this case study, it was possible to extrapolate to a generic case in a representative manner. The greatest difficulties encountered when applying ISF were mapped. The real limitations of using ISF in process plants were related to organizational, technical and economic aspects. The consequently, to focus on finding solutions for them.
Maria Aparecida de Paula Lima,
Limitations of Inherent Safety Techniques Application: A Case Study, Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering.
Vol. 3, No. 2,
2018, pp. 27-31.
N. Jang, K. Han, J. Koo, Y. Yoon, J. Yong, and E. S. Yoon, “Development of chemical accident classification codes and tool for management in process industries,” J. Chem. Eng. Japan, 2009.
D. Song, E. S. Yoon, and N. Jang, “A framework and method for the assessment of inherent safety to enhance sustainability in conceptual chemical process design,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 2018.
N. Ade, G. Liu, A. F. Al-Douri, M. M. El-Halwagi, and M. S. Mannan, “Investigating the effect of inherent safety principles on system reliability in process design,” Process Saf. Environ. Prot., vol. 117, pp. 100–110, 2018.
G. Reniers, L. Talarico, and N. Paltrinieri, “Cost-Benefit Analysis of Safety Measures,” Dyn. Risk Anal. Chem. Pet. Ind., pp. 195–205, Jan. 2016.
D. Hendershot, “What does inherently safer mean D. Hendershot,” CEP Mag., pp. 23–25, 2010.
F. I. Khan and P. R. Amyotte, “How to Make Inherent Safety Practice a Reality,” Can. J. Chem. Eng., vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 2–16, 2003.
T. A. Kletz and P. Amyotte, Process Plants: A Handbook for Inherently Safer Design. 2010.
R. L. Rogers and S. Hallam, “A chemical approach to inherent safety,” no. 124, pp. 235–241, 1991.
S. Mannan, “Challenges in implementing inherent safety principles in new and existing chemical processes,” Mary Kay O’Connor Process Saf. Cent., 2002.
J. C. Charpentier, “In the Frame of Globalization and Sustainability, Process Intensification, a Path to the Future of Chemical and Process Engineering (Molecules into Money),” Chem. Eng. J., vol. 1–3, no. 134, pp. 84–92, 2007.
CCPS, Inherently Safer Chemical Processes: a Life Cycle Approach, Second. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc and American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2009.
P. N. Khoshabi ; Sharratt, “Inherent Safety Through Intensive Structured Processing : the IMPULSE Project,” IChemE, no. 153, pp. 1–5, 2007.
C. Ramshaw, “‘HIGEE’ DISTILLATION - AN EXAMPLE OF PROCESS INTENSIFICATION.,” Chem. Eng., no. 389, pp. 13–14, 1983.
A. Green, B. Johnson, and A. John, “Process intensification magnifies profits,” Chem. Eng., vol. 103, no. 13, pp. 66–73, 1999.
Ž. Olujić, M. Jödecke, A. Shilkin, G. Schuch, and B. Kaibel, “Equipment improvement trends in distillation,” Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, vol. 48, no. 6. pp. 1089–1104, 2009.