Volume 1, Issue 2, April 2017, Pages: 37-43
Received: Feb. 28, 2017;
Accepted: Apr. 7, 2017;
Published: May 16, 2017
Views 119 Downloads 29
Mohammad Reza Moghoomi, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Daneshpajoohan Higher Education Institute, Isfahan, Iran
Amin Kolahdooz, Young Researchers and Elite Club, Khomeinishahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
Several important factors such as the metacenter point, the center of gravity and the center of buoyancy that is prevented from rolling unexpectedly need to be considered to create stability in the ship. In this paper, a fast single craft that can move at the maximum speed of 120 kilometers per hour is investigated and analyzed in terms of design and dynamics stability. According to the results of simulation, the drag and lift coefficients are 8.96×105 and 1.46×106 in the motion of single craft respectively. Also the results are desirable if the lift to drag ratio be more than one (Accordingly this ratio is calculated 1.62 in this paper). In the analysis of the movement of the vessels based on the drag and lift coefficients as 2.48×105 and 8.39×105 respectively, the ratio of the two coefficients is 3.38 which indicates the accuracy of the results.
Mohammad Reza Moghoomi,
Analysis of Dynamic Stability of a Fast Single Craft Being Chased, Applied Engineering.
Vol. 1, No. 2,
2017, pp. 37-43.
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
M. Moghoomi, F. Ghojavand, F. Heidarzadeh, (2015) “Compare calm and turbulent flow analysis rudder profiles of ships with IFS 61-TR 25 and NACA0020 (by Fluent)”, 3th National Confrence & 1st International Confrence on Applid Researches in Electrical, Mechanical & Mechatronic Engineering. (In Persian).
M. Ueno, Y. Tsukada, (2015) “Rudder effectiveness and speed correction for scale model ship testing”, National Maritime Research Institute, 6-38-1 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo181-0004, Japan.
P. Vidmar, M. Perkovič, (2013) “Optimization of upwind sailing applying a canting rudder device”, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Maritime Studies and Transport, Potpomorščakov 4, 6320 Portorož, Slovenia.
B. Ji, X. Luo, X. Wang, X. Peng, Y. Wu, H. Xu, (2011) “Unsteady Numerical Simulation of Cavitating Turbulent Flow Around a Highly Skewed Model Marine Propeller”, China Ship Scientific Research Center, Wuxi 214082, China Journal of Fluids Engineering, Vol. 133, No. 1.
J. Vandamme, Q. Zou, D. Reeve, (2011) “Modeling Floating Object Entry and Exit Using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics”, Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, pp. 213-224.
N. Montazeri, S. H. Mousavizadegan, F. Bakhtiarinejad, (2010) “The Effectiveness of Moving Masses in Reducing the Roll Motion of Floating Vessels”, International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, pp. 101-107.
A. Papanikolaou, (2010) “Computer-Aided Design”, Vol. 42, No. 11, pp. 1028–1044.
Y. Tahara, S. Tohyama, T. Katsui, (2006) “CFD-based multi-objective optimization method for ship design”, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, pp. 499–527.
A. Brown, J. Salced, (2008) “Multiple-Objective Optimization in Naval Ship Design”, American Society of Naval Engineers, Vol. 115, No. 4, pp. 49–62.
M. Chamani, A. Byrami, M. Gholipoor, (2012) “Fluid Mechanics”, Isfahan University Press, pp. 91-92. (In Persian).
M. Saife, M. S. Saife, (1995) “Ship design principles”, Amirkabir University Press, pp. 79-80. (In Persian).