Interesting Cognitive Logic of Vietnamese and English Perception Verbs
International Journal of Language and Linguistics
Volume 5, Issue 4, July 2017, Pages: 95-98
Received: May 6, 2017;
Accepted: May 17, 2017;
Published: Jul. 11, 2017
Views 2126 Downloads 131
Phuong Nguyen Hoang, Faculty of Vietnamese Studies, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vietnam National University, Hochiminh City, Vietnam
Follow on us
Each of the phenomena is perceived by human in certain specific ways from perception to cognition. The next step is the convert of cognitive information into language codes so that these information can be released to the object of communication, the receiver or the listener. Then, the listener receives codes and decodes them in order to understand the information from which he can perform a reverse process. That communication process must have its rules. To communicate successfully, to have mutual-understanding between objects of communication, we need to have a system of cognitive logic rules. Therefore, in this research paper, the author uses the cognitive linguistics analysis approach to investigate the interesting cognitive logic points of the basic perception verbs both in English (look, see, listen, hear, smell, taste and touch) and in Vietnames (nhìn, nghe, ngửi, nếm, sờ and thấy). For research data, the author inspected and collected 3,946 sentences with perception verbs from two sets of English-Vietnamese, Vietnamese-English bilingual novels: The adventures of Sherlock Holmes and Love after war. As a result, what the author has achieved for this research question are how to understand negative cognitive meanings, how to interpret the true-false value of utterances with perception verbs, and some interesting cognitive logic rules we must apply in order to get the exact cognition of the utterances containing perception verbs.
Perception, Cognition, Cognitive Logic, Negative Cognitive Meanings, True-False Value, Cognitive Logic Rules
To cite this article
Phuong Nguyen Hoang,
Interesting Cognitive Logic of Vietnamese and English Perception Verbs, International Journal of Language and Linguistics.
Vol. 5, No. 4,
2017, pp. 95-98.
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Asher Nicholas M., Bonevac Daniel, “How extensional is extensional perception?”, Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 203-228, 1985.
Benthem Johan F. A. K. Van, Meulen G. B. Alice Ter, Handbook of Logic and Language, MIT Press, 1997.
Dan Nguyen Duc, Logic and Vietnamese, Education Press, 1996.
Dan Nguyen Duc, Introduction to Formal Logic, HCMc National University Press, 2005.
Dan Nguyen Duc, “Introduction to Informal Logic”, Journal of Language – Vietnam Linguistics Society, Vol. 7, 3-13, 2013.
Douglas Walton, Informal Logic – A pragmatic approach, CambridgeUniversity Press, 2008.
Hegel Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Science of Logic, Routledge, 2014.
Jacqueline Guéron, Sentence and Discourse, Oxford University Press, 2015.
Janusz Chmielewski, Language and Logic in Ancient China, Polska Akademia Nauk, Warszawa, 2009.
Norris Christopher, On Truth and Meaning: Language, Logic and the Grounds of Belief, Continuum International Publishing Group, 2006.
Ray Jackendoff, Paul Bloom, Karen Wynn, Language, Logic and Concepts, MIT Press, 2002.
Torza Alessandro, Quantifiers, Quantifiers and Quantifiers: Themes in logic, metaphysics and language, Springer, 2015.
Umberto Straccia, Foundations of Fuzzy Logic and Semantic Web Languages, CRC Press, 2013.