Relationship Between the Volatility of Stock Returns and the Volatility of Macroeconomic Variables: A Case of Turkey
American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business
Volume 5, Issue 2, June 2019, Pages: 40-46
Received: Jul. 5, 2019;
Accepted: Aug. 9, 2019;
Published: Sep. 24, 2019
Views 89 Downloads 15
Tuğba Dayıoğlu, Department of Economics and Finance, Nısantası Unıversıty, Istanbul, Turkey
Yılmaz Aydın, Department of Economics, Nısantası Unıversıty, Istanbul, Turkey
In this paper, we examined the relationship between BIST-100 Index (SPI) and a set of macroeconomic variables volatility using Vector Autoregressive (VAR) model. The relationship between the stock market and macroeconomic variables has been subjected to serious economic research. A stock market plays important role for the reallocation of funds in many sectors of an economy. The macroeconomic factors make investors to choose the stock because investors are interested to know about the factors affecting the working of stock to manage their portfolios. Some investors show the stock prices volatility is based on directional trend in the stock prices but actually volatility is amount of fluctuation in stock prices. For this purpose we used the volatility of the variables. This study period 2006-2018 stock market using monthly data for Turkey is to examine the relationship between stock return volatility and macroeconomic volatility. We used the macroeconomic variables volatility these are industrial production (IP), money supply (M1), inflation rate (CPI), US dollar equivalent exchange rate (EX) and oil prices (OIL). We used montly data for the period between january 2006 and december 2018. Asymmetric GARCH models are used for the series volatility. The best performing GARCH model in these models are considered as volatlity. Exchange rate and industrial production index have an important effect on stock market volatility.
Relationship Between the Volatility of Stock Returns and the Volatility of Macroeconomic Variables: A Case of Turkey, American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business.
Vol. 5, No. 2,
2019, pp. 40-46.
Bollerslev, T., “A Conditional Heteroscedastic Time Series Model for Speculative Prices and Rates of Return”, Review of Economicsand Statistics, 69, 1987, s. 5 42-547.
Çağlayan, E., Dayıoglu T. (2009). Döviz Kuru Getiri Volatilitesinin Koşullu Değişen Varyans Modelleri ile Öngörüsü, İstanbul Üniversitesi Iktisat Fakültesi Ekonometri ve İstatistik Dergisi, Ekonometri ve İstatistik Sayı. 9,1-6, s. 2-16.
Davis, N., Kutan, A., “Inflation and Output as Predictors of StockReturns and Volatility: International Evidence”, Applied Financial Economics, 13, 2003, s. 693-700. Clare, A. D.
Ding, Z., Granger, C. W. J., & Engle R. F. (1993). A Long Memory Property of Stock Market Returns and a New Model, Journal of Empirical Finance, 1, 83-106.
Durukan B., “On the Relationship Between Stock Prices andMacroeconomic Variables in Istanbul Stock Exchange”, ISEReview, 3, 1999, s. 11.
Engle, R. F., G. G. J. Lee (1993), “A Permanent and Transitory Component Model of Stock Return Volatility”, University of California, San Diego, Department of Economics, Discussion Paper, 9244.
Glosten, L., Jagannathan, R., Runkle, D. (1993), Relationship between the expected value and volatility of the nominal excess returns on stocks. Journal of Finance, 48, 1779-1802.
Groenewold, N., Fraser, P., “Share Price and Macroeconomic Factors”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 24, 1997, s. 1367-1383.
Harris, R. D., C. C. Küçüközmen, “The Empirical Distribution of Stock Returns: Evidence From an Emerging European Market”, Applied Economics Letters, 8, 2001, s. 367-371.
Kwon, C. S., Shin, T. S., “Cointegration and Causality Between Macroeconomic Variables and Stock Market Returns”, Global Finance Journal, 10 (1), 1999, s. 71-81.
Lıljeblom, E., Stenius, M., “Macroeconomic Volatility and StockMarket Volatility: Empirical Evidence on Finnish Data”, Applied Financial Economics, 7, 1997, s. 419-426.
Mackinnon, J. G., “Critical Values for Cointegration Tests”, in Engle, R. F. and Granger, C. W. J (eds), Long-run Economic Relationship, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1991.
Morelli, D., “The Relationship Between Conditional Stock Market Volatility and Conditional Macroeconomic Volatility Empirical Evidence Based on UK Data”, International Review of Financial Analysis, 11, 2002, s. 101-110.
Muradoğlu, F., “An Empirical Investigation of Stock Returns andDeterminants of Risk in an Emerging Market: GARCH-Mmodeling at ISE”, Multinational Finance Journal, 3, 1999, s. 223252.
Nelson, D. B. (1991), Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: a new approach. Econometrica, 59, 347-370.
Payaslıoğlu, C., “Testing Volatility Asymmetry in Istanbul StockExchange” ISE Review, 5, 2001, s. 1-11. Schwert, G. W., “Why Does Stock Market Volatility Change OverTime?”, Journal of Finance, 44, 1989, s. 1115-1153.
Schwert, G. W., “Why Does Stock Market Volatility Change Over Time?”, Journal of Finance, 44, 1989, s. 1115-1153.
Sims, C. A. (1980a), Macroeconomics and Reality, Econometrica 48, 1–48.
Tarı, R. (2006). Ekonometri. İstanbul: Avcı Ofset, 4. Baskı.
Thomas, S. H., “Macroeconomic Factors, the APT and theUK Stock Market”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 21 (3), 1994, s. 309-330.
Z. A., Aybar, B., “Volatility in Istanbul Stock Exchange”, ISEReview, 2, 1998, s. 35-47.
Yılmaz, M. K., “Stock Market Volatility and Its Term Structure:Empirical Evidence From the Turkish Market”, ISE Review, 1, 1997, s. 425-43.
Zivot, E. (2000), Noteson Structural VAR Modeling, availableat: http://www.eco.uc3m.es/~jgonzalo/teaching/timeseriesma/zivotvarnotes reading.pdf
www.tcmb.gov.tr TCMB Elektronik Veri Tabanı Dağıtım Sistemi.