The Key Role of Togo Government in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), and Corporate Governance (CG) Among Togo Companies
European Business & Management
Volume 3, Issue 5, September 2017, Pages: 76-81
Received: Jul. 26, 2017; Accepted: Oct. 11, 2017; Published: Nov. 15, 2017
Views 1157      Downloads 71
Bienmali Kombate, Faculty of Economic and Business, University of Lome, Lomé, Togo
Xu Wanxiao, College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan, People’s Republic of China
Article Tools
Follow on us
Beyond to bring light on the role played by Togo government in business in ethical way to contribute to business and it community welfare, in this paper, we highlight the key role that played the government as a driver of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and regulator of Corporate Governance (CG). The paper was drawn based on recent and previous studies. Lee, M. (2008). (Vogel, 2005: 2); Hasan Al-Zu'bi (2014). Garriga and Melé (2004), (Donaldson & Preston, 1995; Freeman, 1994), Friedman’s criticism (1970), Laura A., Josep M., Antonio T., Atle M., and Francesco P. (2008). We focus by a basic analysis basing on at several mejor that government interfere in business and we deducted for good ethical way in CSR and CG need government intervention. The concluding discussion assesses implications of and further research questions arising from the findings concerning the impact that challenge manager in managerial decision by government interference in CSR and CG.
CSR, CG, Government, Togo
To cite this article
Bienmali Kombate, Xu Wanxiao, The Key Role of Togo Government in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), and Corporate Governance (CG) Among Togo Companies, European Business & Management. Vol. 3, No. 5, 2017, pp. 76-81. doi: 10.11648/j.ebm.20170305.11
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Aaronson, S. & Reeves, J. (2002a). The European Response to Public Demands for Global Corporate Social Responsibility. Washington, D. C.: National Policy Association.
Aaronson, S. & Reeves, J. (2002b). Corporate Social Responsibility in the Global Village: The Role of Public Policy. Washington, D.C.: National Policy Association.
Albareda, L., Ysa, T., Lozano, J. M. (2004). “The Role of Public Policies in Promoting CSR: A Comparison among the EU–15.” Paper presented at the Interdisciplinary CSR Research Conference, Nottingham.
Albareda, L., Ysa, T., Lozano, J. M. (2005). The Role of Governments in Fostering CSR. In A. Kakabadse & M. Morsing (Eds), Corporate Social Responsibility. Reconciling Aspiration with Application. Houndmills: Palgrave.
Ahmad Z (2014); what are business ethics? Research gate. Link:
Detomasi. D. (2007). The Multinational Corporation and Global Governance: Modelling Global Public Policy Networks. Journal of Business Ethics (2007) 71:321–334.
Freeman RE (1994) The politics of stakeholder theory: some future directions. Business ethics quarterly 4:409–421.
Friedman M (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase profits. N Y Times Mag 32–33, 122–126, Sept 2013Fox, T., Ward, H. and Howard, B. 2002. Public Sector Roles in Strengthening Corporate Social Responsibility: A Baseline Study. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Garriga E, Mele D (2004) Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping and territory. J Bus Ethics 53:51–74.
Gribben, C., Pinnington, K. Wilson, A. (2001). Governments as Partners: The Role of the Central Government in Developing New Social Partnerships. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Center.
Jorge (2014); what are business ethics? Research gate. Link:
Kjaergaard, C. & Westphalen, S. (2001). From Collective Bargaining to Social Partnerships: New Roles of the Social Partners in Europe. Copenhagen: The Copenhagen Centre.
Laura A, Josep M. Lozano, Antonio Tencati, Atle M. and Francesco P.(2008). The changing role of governments in corporate social responsibility: drivers and responses. Business Ethics: A European Review Volume 17 Number 4 October 2008.
Lee, M. (2008). A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10, pp. 53–73.
Midttun, A. 2004. ‘Realigning business, government and civil society: the C(S)R model compared to the (neo)liberal and welfare state models.’ Paper presented at the 3rd Colloquium of the European Academy of Business in Society, Ghent.
Moon, J. 2004. ‘Government as a driver of corporate social responsibility: the UK in comparative perspective.’ ICCSR Research Paper Series, 20-2004. ICCSR, University of Nottingham, pp. 1–7.
Nelson, J. and Zadek, S. 2000. Partnership Alchemy –New Social Partnerships in Europe. Copenhagen: The Copenhagen Centre.
Nelson, J. & Zadek, S. (2000). Partnership Alchemy – New Social Partnerships in Europe. Copenhagen: The Copenhagen Centre.
The Frank Hawkins Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise. 2003. Promoting Global Corporate Social Responsibility. The Kenan Institute Study Group Consensus. Policy Recommendations. Washington, DC: The Frank Hawkins Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise.
Peter D. (1992), Managing for the Future (New York: Harper Collins).
Robert Allen Peterson, O. C. Ferrell (2005). Business ethics: new challenges for business schools and corporate leaders. M. E. Sharpe.
Vogel DJ (2005) Is there a market for virtue? The business case for corporate social responsibility. Cal manage rev 47(4):19–4.
Zadek, S. (2001a). The Civil Corporation: the New Economy of Corporate Citizenship. London, Stirling, VA: Earthscan.
Zadek, S. (2001b). Third Generation Corporate Citizenship. London: The Foreign Policy Center and Accountability.
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (001)347-983-5186