Journal of Political Science and International Relations
Volume 2, Issue 4, December 2019, Pages: 86-92
Received: Sep. 29, 2019;
Accepted: Oct. 26, 2019;
Published: Oct. 31, 2019
Views 440 Downloads 176
Ye Liu, Institute of Marxist Philosophy, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China
The modern nation-state is a very important and complicated political entity form in today’s world. In the foreseeable future, it will still be one of the world’s most general and dominant community pattern. Therefore, it has certain academic and practical significance to understand the basic situation of modern nation-state by analyzing and explaining its fundamental definition, core bearing consciousness and legitimacy construction. This paper suggests that modern nation-state as the most common pattern of modern political entity is the product of modern society, which ensuring the existence of the whole ethnic community and all individuals in it. The nation-state has to cohere and unite its people through the dual core of national identity and nationalist ideology. On one hand, national identity has become the operational foundation of modern nation-state and provided the most core cohesion for the establishment, consolidation and development for it. On the other hand, nationalism can be a kind of modern ethnic ideology and social political movement, and also a demand of economic system, a construction of social cultures and feelings. Only on this basis, the nation-state’s autonomy and people’s survival rights and unique values can be guaranteed, then the legitimacy construction of the nation-state can be realized. And the legitimacy construction of modern nation-state embodies in the enforcement of nationality policy, the protection of national sovereignty and the balance of international order. In the era of nation-state, we have to continuous concern both its broad connotation and its problem domain to grasp the essence of the modern society.
The Basic Situation of Modern Nation-State, Journal of Political Science and International Relations.
Vol. 2, No. 4,
2019, pp. 86-92.
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Tom Nairn, The Break-up of Britain: Crisis and Neo-Nationalism, London: NLB, 1977, p. 317.
Tom Nairn and Paul James, Global Matrix: Nationalism, Globalism and State-Terrorism, London: Pluto Press, 2005, p. 76.
Tom Nairn, Faces of Nationalism: Janus Revisited, London: Verso, 1997, pp. 4-190.
Xu Xun, Nationalism, Beijing: Oriental Press, 2014, pp. 34-40.
Ning Fang and Bingquan Wang, On the Ideological Trend of Nationalism, Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2004, p. 22.
Jinxiu Zhai, Interpretation of Post-nationalism in Western Europe: A Multidimensional Perspective in the Context of Tradition and Postmodernism, Jinan: Shandong University Press, 2012, p. 212.
Oliver Zimmer, Nationalism in Europe, 1890-1940, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003, p. 5.
Hans Khon, The Idea of Nationalism: A Study of Its Origins and Background, London: The Macmillan Company, 1946, pp. 10-11.
John Breuilly, Nationalism and the State, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1993, p. 2.
Michael Hechter, Containing Nationalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000, p. 7.
Liah Greenfeld, The Spirit of Capitalism: Nationalism and Economic Growth, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003, p. 58.
Tom Nairn, “Scotland and Europe”, in New Left Review, Vol. 83, 1974, p. 60.
Ernest Gellner, Thought and Change, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1964, p. 162.
Eric Hobsbawm, Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992, p. 10.
Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, London: Verso, 2006, p. 4.
Michael Cox, “Nationalism, nations and the crisis of world order”, in International Relations, Vol. 33, No. 2, 2019, p. 247.
Sidharth Luthra and Nivedita Mukhija, The Nationalism Debate, Concerns, and Constitutional Response, in National Law School of India Review, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2018, p. 9.