Key Risk Index Identification of UHV Project Construction Based on Improved Rough Set Model
Science Journal of Energy Engineering
Volume 3, Issue 4-1, July 2015, Pages: 6-13
Received: Dec. 14, 2014; Accepted: Dec. 15, 2014; Published: Dec. 27, 2014
Views 3176      Downloads 184
Sen Guo, School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Changping District, Beijing 102206, China
Huiru Zhao, School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Changping District, Beijing 102206, China
Article Tools
Follow on us
Compared with the conventional power grid project, the UHV project construction faces more challenges and risks. Identifying the key risk indicators of UHV project construction can improve the level of project risk management and reduce risk-related loss. Taken the data missing of risk indicators into consideration, an improved rough set model for key risk indicators identification of UHV project construction is employed with the introduction of information content. Firstly, the information content of conditional attributes set and information significance of each conditional attribute are calculated; Secondly, the reduced core attribute matrix is formed; Then, the discernibility matrix is built; Finally, the final core attribute set is determined. After building the risk index system, the key risk indicators identification of a certain UHV project construction is performed. The calculation result shows that “land requisition and logging policy risk”, “project security management risk” and “land requisition, removing and crop compensation risk” are the key risk indicators.
UHV Project Construction, Key Risk Indicators, Index Identification, Improved Rough Set Model
To cite this article
Sen Guo, Huiru Zhao, Key Risk Index Identification of UHV Project Construction Based on Improved Rough Set Model, Science Journal of Energy Engineering. Special Issue: Soft Computing Techniques for Energy Engineering. Vol. 3, No. 4-1, 2015, pp. 6-13. doi: 10.11648/j.sjee.s.2015030401.12
Liu Zhenya. China’s electricity and energy M] .Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 2012
Zhao H, Guo S. Risk Evaluation on UHV Power Transmission Construction Project Based on AHP and FCE Method [J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, 2014.
Wei Minghua, Lu Shibao, Zheng Zhihong. Risk analysis on construction of agricultural water conservancy projects [J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2011, 27(Supp.1): 233-237.
Huang Hong-wei, Zhu Lin, Xie Xiong-yao. Risk assessment on engineering feasibility of key events in Shanghai metro line No. 11 [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2007, 29(7): 1103-1107.
Xu Wei-ping, Wang Xiu-ying. Environmental risk assessment of oil field pipeline construction project based on mutation series method [J]. Chinese Journal of Systems Science, 2012, 20(1): 89-93.
Zhou Li-sha, Li Chen, Yu Shun-kun. System dynamics simulation research on project management model for china's smart grid [J]. East China Electric Power, 2012, 40(1): 31-34.
Zhang Qiang, Wang Ning. Application of network management system for project files in power grid construction [J]. Power System Technology, 2007, 31(S2): 83-86.
Guo Ri-cai, Xu Zi-zhi, Qi Li-zhong, et al. General situation of typical transmission line design in usa and its enlightenment to design and construction of power grids in china [J]. Power System Technology, 2007, 31(12): 33-41.
Guo Ri-cai, Yuan Zhao-xiang, Li Bao-jin. A survey on typical design of substations in france and korea and relevant suggestion to power network engineering in china [J]. Power System Technology, 2006, 30(6): 73-76.
An lei, Wang Mian-bin, Tan Zhong-fu. Risk assessment model based on set pair-fault tree method for power transmission project [J]. East China Electric Power, 2011, 39(1): 12-18.
Wu Yunna, Liu Yarui, Wang Weibing. Risk factor analysis on power grid transmission and transformation project [J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2009, (2): 133-139.
Wang Liping, Wang Xiaoru. Differential protection based on calculated power for uhv transmission lines [J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2013, 33(19): 174-182.
Xie Qiang, Li Jiguo, Yan Chengyong, et al. Wind tunnel test on wind load transferring mechanism in the 1000 kV UHV transmission tower-line system [J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2013, 33(1): 109-116.
GAO Shuang, DONG Lei, GAO Yang, et al. Mid-long term wind speed prediction based on rough set theory [J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2012, 30(1): 32-37.
Wang Gang, Luo Huihui, Huang Min. A rough-set based detection method for detuning components in a triple-tuned DC filter[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems,, 2011, 35(20): 81-87.
Zhang Zhiyi, Yuan Rongxiang, Yang Tongzhong, et al. Rule Extraction for Power System Fault Diagnosis Based on the Combination of Rough Sets and Niche Genetic Algorithm [J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2009, 24(1): 158-163.
Su Hong-sheng, Li Qun-zhan. Substation fault diagnosis method based on rough set theory and neural network model [J]. Power System Technology, 2005, 29(16): 66-70.
Liu Si-ge, Cheng Hao-zhong, Cui Wen-jia. Optimal model of multi-objective electric power network planning based on rough set theory [J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2007, 27(7): 65-69.
Bai C, Sarkis J. Green supplier development: analytical evaluation using rough set theory [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2010, 18(12): 1200-1210.
Liang J., Shi Z., Li D.. Information entropy, rough entropy and knowledge granulation in incomplete information systems [J]. International Journal of General Systems, 2006, 35 (6): 641–654.
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (001)347-983-5186