Effect of CTAB Concentration on Foam Properties and Discussion Based on Liquid Content and Bubble Size in the Foam
International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering
Volume 6, Issue 1, January 2018, Pages: 18-24
Received: Dec. 15, 2017;
Accepted: Jan. 15, 2018;
Published: Jan. 24, 2018
Views 2317 Downloads 148
Junchao Wang, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China
Yijun Cao, Chinese National Engineering Research Center of Coal Preparation and Puriﬁcation, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China
Guosheng Li, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China
Lijun Deng, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China
Shulei Li, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China
Surfactants known as frothers are widely used in froth flotation to produce small bubbles and stabilize the froth, meanwhile, froth stability plays an important role in determining the product grade and recovery achieved from a mineral flotation process, and therefore it is of great significance to study the effect of surfactant on foam properties. However, foam properties, especially foam stability concerning liquid content of foam and evolution of bubble size, in ﬂotation has received little attention. In this study, we intensively investigated the foamability and foam stability of different concentration cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) solutions. Experiments were carried out using a commercially available instrument, Foam Scan, which determined simultaneously the foaming time, foam volume, the liquid content of foam and bubble size distribution. Particularly, the evolution of bubble size can be allowed to determine at a regular time interval. The results showed that as an increase in CTAB concentration, the foamability continuously increased till reached a constant at a critical micelle concentration (CMC), however, the foam stability initially increased and then presented a little decrease when the tested concentrations were larger than its CMC. An argument based on foam drainage, bubble coalescence and coarsening processes is proposed to account for the effect of CTAB concentration foam properties.
Effect of CTAB Concentration on Foam Properties and Discussion Based on Liquid Content and Bubble Size in the Foam, International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering.
Vol. 6, No. 1,
2018, pp. 18-24.
R. P. King, Principles of Flotation, South african, 1982.
A. Saintjalmes and D. Langevin, Time evolution of aqueous foams: drainage and coarsening, J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 2002, 14 (40), 9397–9412.
S. N. Tan, D. Fornasiero, R. Sedev and J. Ralston, Marangoni effects in aqueous polypropylene glycol foams, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2005, 286 (2), 719–729.
S. N. Tan, D. Fornasiero, R. Sedev and J. Ralston. The role of surfactant structure on foam behaviour, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 2005, 263 (1–3), 233–238.
Y. Xing, X. Gui, L. Pan, B. Pinchasik, Y. Cao, J. Liu, M Kappl and H Butt. Recent experimental advances for understanding bubble-particle attachment in ﬂotation. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2017, 246, 105–132.
L. G. Wang and R. H. Yoon, Effects of surface forces and film elasticity on foam stability, Int. J. Miner. Process, 2008, 85 (4), 101–110.
G. Bournival, Z. Du, S. Ata and G. J. Jameson, Foaming and gas dispersion properties of non-ionic surfactants in the presence of an inorganic electrolyte, Chemical Engineering Science, 2004, 116, 536–546.
D. Kosior, J. Zawala and K. Malysa, Influence of n-octanol on the bubble impact velocity, bouncing and the three phase contact formation at hydrophobic solid surface, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 2014, 441 (3), 788–795.
K. Hadle, N. Barbian and J. J. Cilliers, The relationship between froth stability and flotation performance down a bank of cells, In: Jameson, G. J., Yoon, R. H. (Eds.), Proceedings Centenary of Flotation Symposium. Aus IMM, 2005, 516–523.
F. Melo and J. S. Laskowski, Fundamental properties of flotation frothers and their effect on flotation, Minerals Engineering, 2006 (6-8), 19, 766–773.
J. A. Finch, S. Gelinas and P. Moyo, Frother-related research at mcgill university, Minerals Engineering, 2006, 19 (6), 726–733.
P. Stevenson, Hydrodynamic theory of rising foams, Minerals Engineering, 2007, 20 (3), 282–289.
B. A. Wills and J. A. Finch, Chapter 12–Froth Flotation, Wills Mineral Processing Technology, 2016, 265–380.
J. J. Bikerman, Formation and Structure, Foams. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1973, 33–64.
T. Tamura, Y. Kaneko and M. Ohyama, Dynamic surface tension and foaming properties of aqueous polyoxyethylene n–dodecyl ether solutions, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 1995, 173 (2), 493–499.
S. A. Koehler, S. Hilgenfeldt and H. A. Stone, Foam drainage on the microscale II. modeling flow through single plateau borders, Journal of Colloid & Interface Science, 2004, 276 (2), 439–449.
E. Carey and C. Stubenrauch, Foaming properties of mixtures of a non–ionic (C12DMPO) and an ionic surfactant (C12TAB), Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2010, 343 (1), 314–323.
Y. L. GU, Q. M. FENG, L. M. OU and P. C. LÜ, A new method of testing frother performance, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 2013, 23 9), 2776–2780.
S. N. Tan, D. Fornasiero, R. Sedev and J. Ralston, The interfacial conformation of polypropylene glycols and foam behaviour, Colloid and Surfaces A, 2004, 250 (1–3), 307–315.
S. N. Tan, A. Jiang, J. J. Liau, S. R. Grano and R. G. Horn, The surface dilational viscosity of Polypropylene glycol solutions and its influence on water flow and foam behavior, Int. J. Miner. Process, 2009, 93 (2), 194–203.
N. D. Denkov, S. Tcholakova, K. Golemanov, K. P. Ananthpad–manabhan and A. Lips, The role of surfactant type and bubble surface mobility in foam rheology, Soft Matter, 2009, 5 (18), 3389–3408.
P. Stevenson, Foam Engineering: Fundamentals and Applications, John Wiley& Sons, Ltd., New York, NY, 2012.
B. S. Murray, Stabilization of bubbles and foams, Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, 2007, 12 (4–5), 232–241.
M. Simjoo, T. Rezaei, A. Andrianov and P. L. J. Zitha, Foam stability in the presence of oil: Effect of surfactant concentration and oil type, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 2013, 438 (45), 174–185.
R. Petkova, S. Tcholakova and N. D. Denkov. Role of polymer–surfactant interactions in foams: Effects of pH and surfactant head group for cationic polyvinylamine and anionic surfactants, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 2013, 438, 174–185.
A. Britan, M. Liverts, G. Ben-Dor, S. A. Koehler and N. Bennani, The effect of fine particles on the drainage and coarsening of foam, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 2009, 344 (1), 15–23.
N. Louvet, F. Rouyer and O. Pitois, Ripening of a draining foam bubble, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2009, 334 (1), 82–86.
K. Malysa and K. Lunkenheimer. Foams under dynamic conditions, Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, 2008, 13 (3), 150–162.
A. Cervantes–Martínez, A. Saint–Jalmes, A. Maldonado and D. Langevin, Effect of cosurfactant on the freedrainage regime of aqueous foams, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2005, 292 (2), 544–547.
J. Boos, W. Drenckhan and C. Stubenrauch, Protocol for studying aqueous foams stabilized by surfactant mixtures, J. Surfactants Deterg., 2012, 16 (1), 1–12.
S. A. Magrabi, B. Z. Dlugogorski and G. J. Jameson, Free drainage in aqueous foams: model and experimental study, AICh E J., 2001, 47 (2), 314–327.
A. W. Adamson and A. P. Gast, Physical Chemistry of Surfaces, sixth ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1997.
C. Stubenrauch, V. B. Fainerman, E. V. Aksenenko and R. Miller, Adsorption behavior and dilational rheology of the cationic alkyl trimethylammonium bromides at the water/air interface, J. Phys. Chem., 2005, B 109 (4), 1505–1509.
T. N. Le, C. M. Phan, A. V. Nguyen and H. M. Ang, An unusual synergistic adsorption of MIBC and CTAB mixtures at the air/water interface, Minerals Engineering, 2012, 39 (6), 255–261.
R. J. Pugh, Foaming, foam films, antifoaming and defoaming, Advances in Colloid & Interface Science, 1996, 64 (95):67–142.
I. Cantat, S. Cohen–Addad, F. Elias, F. Graner, R. Höhler and O. Pitois, et al., Foams: structure and dynamics, Dissertations & Theses – Gradworks, 2013, 424 (4–5):175–308.
J. L. Wang, A. V. Nguyen and S. Farrokhpay, A critical review of the growth, drainage and collapse of foams, Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2016, 228, 55–70.
P. Grassia, S. J. Neethling, C. Cervantes, H. T. Lee, The growth, drainage and bursting of foams, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 2006, 274, 110–124.
J. S. Lioumbas, E. Georgiou, K. Kostoglou and T. D. Karapantsios, Foam free drainage and bubbles size for surfactant concentrations below the CMC, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 2015, 487, 92–103.
F. Melo and J. S. Laskowski, Fundamental properties of flotation frothers and their effect on flotation, Minerals Engineering, 2006, 19 (6–8), 766–773.
Y. S. Cho and J. S. Laskowski, Effect of flotation frothers on bubble size and foam stability, Int. J. Miner. Process, 2002, 64 (2–3), 69–80.
Y. S. Cho and J. S. Laskowski, Bubble coalescence and its effect on dynamic foamability, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 2006, 80, 299–305.
R. A. Grau, J. S. Laskowski and K. Heiskanen, Effect of frothers on bubble size, Int. J. Miner. Process, 2005, 76 (4), 225–233.
H. Do, M. Brady, D. P. Telionis, P. P. Vlachos and R. Yoon, Numerical modeling and experiments of coarsening foam, Int. J. Miner. Process, 2011, 98 (1–2), 66–73.