A Detailed Comparison Between FOC and DTC Methods of a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Drive
Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Volume 3, Issue 2-1, March 2015, Pages: 92-100
Received: Feb. 8, 2015; Accepted: Feb. 9, 2015; Published: Feb. 27, 2015
Views 3280      Downloads 239
Authors
Navid Maleki, Department of Electrical Engineering, Saveh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Saveh, Iran
Mohammad Reza Alizadeh Pahlavani, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Malek-Ashtar University of Technology (MUT), Tehran, Iran
Iman Soltani, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Malek-Ashtar University of Technology (MUT), Tehran, Iran
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
This paper focuses on detail comparison between two common control methods including Field Oriented Control (FOC) and Direct Torque Control (DTC) of the Permanent Magnet Synchronous (PMS) motor. The main characteristics of the motor such as torque, flux and speed under different operation conditions are studied and the advantages of FOC and DTC are obtained. It can be concluded that although both the DTC and FOC methods have different structures but the motor has the same behavior on the control methods. Thus, it is concluded that both the methods can be implemented as the Direct Flux Ccontrol (DFC) and can be applied as an optimized method of PMS motor control in the industry applications.
Keywords
PMSM, Vector Control (VC), FOC, DTC, Optimized Control Method
To cite this article
Navid Maleki, Mohammad Reza Alizadeh Pahlavani, Iman Soltani, A Detailed Comparison Between FOC and DTC Methods of a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Drive, Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Special Issue: Research and Practices in Electrical and Electronic Engineering in Developing Countries. Vol. 3, No. 2-1, 2015, pp. 92-100. doi: 10.11648/j.jeee.s.2015030201.30
References
[1]
Juha Pyrhonen. 2011, ELECTRIC-DRIVE-BASED CONTROL AND ELECTRIC ENERGY REGENERATION IN A HYDRAULIC SYSTEM.Book..
[2]
P. Pragasan, and R. Krishnan, 1998, Modeling of permanent magnet motor drives, IEEE Trans. Industrial electronics, vol. 35, no.4, nov. 1988\
[3]
Anders Kornberg, 2012, Design and Simulation of Field Oriented Control and Direct Torque Control for a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor with Positive Saliency.Thesis For M.S. degree ,uppsala university.
[4]
Thomas M. Jahns, Gerald B. Kliman, and Thomas W. Neumann. Interior permanent-magnet synchronous motors for adjustable-speed drives. IEEE Transaction on industry applications, IA-22(4):738-747, 1986.
[5]
R.D. Doncker, D.W.J. Pulle, and A. Veltman. Advanced Electrical Drives: Analysis, Modeling, Control. Power Systems. Springer, 2011. ISBN 9789400701793. URLhttp://books.google.se/books?id=\_sEDx2lAKboC.
[6]
Yi Wang and Jianguo Zhu. Modeling and implementation of an improved dsvm scheme for pmsm dtc. International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems, pages 1042-1046, 2008.
[7]
H. L. Huy, 1999, Comparison of Field-Oriented Control and Direct Torque Control for Induction Motor Drives, 0-7803-5589-X/99/10.00 © 1999 IEEE.
[8]
[8] A. Daghigh, M.B.B. Sharifian, M. Farasat, A Modified Direct Torque Control of IPM Synchronous Machine Drive With Constant Switching Frequency and Low Ripple in Torque, in Conf. 18th Iranian conference on Electrical Engineering, ICEE, Isfahan-Iran, 2010.
[9]
L. Zhong, M. F. Rahman, 1997, Analysis of Direct Torque Control in Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Drives, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, VOL. 12, NO. 3, MAY 1997
[10]
L. Zhong, M. F. Rahman, and K. W. Lim, 1995, A strategy for torque control for high-performance interior permanent magnet synchronous motor drives, in Proc. Australasian Univ. Power Engineering Conf., 1995, pp. 259–264.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186