Potentials for Cassava Processing in the Littoral Region of Cameroon
International Journal of Agricultural Economics
Volume 2, Issue 4, July 2017, Pages: 122-128
Received: May 12, 2017; Accepted: May 19, 2017; Published: Jul. 10, 2017
Views 315      Downloads 25
Authors
Fon Dorothy Engwali, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences, University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon
Djoudji Serge Temkeng, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences, University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Smallholder agriculture is characterized by underemployment during off seasons, low-income earnings and severe post-harvest losses. This study aimed at examining the effects of cassava processing on rural households in the Littoral region of Cameroon; identifying the different processing techniques, the different products derived from transformation, analysing the profitability of the products derived identifying key factors that hinder the downstream development of the cassava sector; and. Data were collected using questionnaires administered to a sample of 140 respondents who were selected through the multistage random sampling technique. Descriptive statistics and budgetary analyses were used to analyse the data. The results from the analysis revealed that, women represent 82.86% of the number of processors and their average age is 44 years. The average household size is 7, while the education level is low; 48.57% had received only primary education and 38.57% were secondary school dropout. Their initial capital came from their personal savings. The following methods of cassava processing amongst others were found in the study area: grating, drying, draining, fermentation, grilling, sieving, extraction, and soaking. Results from the budgetary analysis revealed that, each of the different by- products ′waterfufu′, ′starch′, ′miondo′, ′bobolo′, ′fufu dry′ and ′garri′ generate profit. For ′Bobolo′ the value added is 98 FCFA, ′Miondo′ 95FCFA, starch 90Fcfa, ′waterfufu′ 70Fcfa, ′garri′ 65FCFA and 60 CFA francs for dry ′fufu′. The most profitable product was found to be ′bobolo′, followed by ′miondo′. Based on the various cost/benefit ratios, it is evident that all these products are profitable because the ratios are greater than unity. It was revealed that the cassava sector does not go without difficulties; inadequate equipment, and inadequate training of processors were the main difficulties encountered. The cassava should be industrialized by installing many machines in rural areas and to invest more in training the processors.
Keywords
Cassava, Processing Units, Cassava Product, Value-Chain, Value-Added
To cite this article
Fon Dorothy Engwali, Djoudji Serge Temkeng, Potentials for Cassava Processing in the Littoral Region of Cameroon, International Journal of Agricultural Economics. Vol. 2, No. 4, 2017, pp. 122-128. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20170204.14
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
World Bank. “Women: Key to African development”. The World Bank, Washington D. C. News Release No: 2000/340/AFR.
[2]
Document de Stratégie pour la Croissance et l’Emploi (DSCE). AGRISTAT n°16, MINADER, 2009.
[3]
World Food Programme. “Situation de la sécurité alimentaire et des marchés au Cameroun”. Wfp. 2011. Available from website www.wfp.org/foodsecurity, consulted on 05/07/2015.
[4]
World Bank. The World Bank Annual Report: Year in Review. Washington, DC. © World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/2378 License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0. 2011.
[5]
G. Essono, M. Ayodele, A. Akoa, J. Foko, J. Gockowski, and S. Olembo, “Cassava production and processing characteristics in southern Cameroon: An analysis of factors causing variations in practices between farmers using principal component analysis (PCA)”. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2008; 3(1): 49-59.
[6]
Ministère de l’Agriculture et du Développement Rural (MINADER), “Dans Amélioration de la commercialisation et de transformation du manioc au Cameroun: contraintes et perspectives de la chaîne de valeur” 2006.
[7]
T. Emmanuel,“Amélioration de la commercialisation et de transformation du manioc au Cameroun: contraintes et perspectives de la chaîne de valeur, Dans: Reconstruire le potentiel alimentaire de l’Afrique de l’Ouest”, A. Elbehri (ed.), FAO/FIDA, 2013.
[8]
Scott, J. Gregory, Rosegrant, W. Mark, Ringler and Claudia, “Roots and tubers for the 21st century: Trends, projections and policy options. Food, Agriculture and Environment”. Discussion Paper 31, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington D. C. 2000.
[9]
G. Amani, C. Nindjin, B. N’zue, A. Tschannen and D. Aka, Potentialité à la transformation du manioc (manihot esculenta crantz) en Afrique de l’ouest. Actes de l'Atelier "Potentialités à la transformation du manioc en Afrique de l'Ouest" - Abidjan, 4-7 Juin 2007, 358 pages.
[10]
R. D. Cook and J. H. Cock, “Cassava crops up again”. In: New Scientist, 1989; vol. 1669: pp. 63-68.
[11]
J. Kwatia and W. Y. Jeon, in "Cassava in Tropical, IITA", Ibadan, Nigeria, 1990.
[12]
Collaborative Study of Cassava in Africa (COSCA). Working Paper 1996:. P13.
[13]
I. NwekeFelix, “Cassava: A Cash Crop in Africa. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture”. (COSCA)Ibadan, Nigeria, Working. 1996: P. 4.
[14]
Direction Régionale/ Ministère de la Planification de la Programmation et de l’Aménagement du Territoire /Littoral. Rapport sur le Développement Économique du Cameroun: Région du Littoral, 2013.
[15]
M. A. Ukpongson, J. Chikaire, F. C. Anaeto, R. N. Nwakwasi, O. O. Aja and C. L. Ike,“Effects of Cassava Processing and Value Added Products on Sustainable Poverty Alleviation in Ikwuano Area of Abia State Nigeria”. New York Science Journal.2011; 4 (10): 73 – 77] http://wwwsciencepub.net/newyork.
[16]
F. I. Nweke, B. O. Ugwu, A. G. O. Dixon, C. L. A. Asadu and O. Ajobo, “Cassava Production in Ghana”. COSCA working paper No. 21, IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria 1997.
[17]
O. Oluwasola, “Stimulating rural employment and income for cassava (Manihot sp.) processing farming households in Oyo State, Nigeria through policy initiatives”. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics.2010; Vol. 2(2): pp. 18-25.
[18]
O. Oluwasola and T. Alimi, “Financial intermediation in agriculture in Nigeria: Emerging role of Non-Governmental Organisations”Agrosearch. 2007; 9(1&2): 43-51.
[19]
F. N. Nnadi, and C. O. Akwiwu, “Rural Women’s Response to Selected crop Production Techniques in Imo State, Nigeria. Global Approaches to Extension Practice. 2005: 1 (1) 47-55.
[20]
T. Phillips, D. S. Taylor, L. Sanni, and M. Akoroda,“A cassava Industrial Revolution in Nigeria. The potential for a new industrial crop”. 43 p. IFAD/FAO. Rome, 2004.
[21]
F. N. Nnadi, and C. O. Akwiwu, “Adoption of Improved Poultry Practices by Rural Women in Imo State, Nigeria”. Animal Production Research Advances 2006: 39-44.
[22]
C. U. Nwajiuba, “Socio Economic Impact of Cassava Post-harvest Technologies on Smallholder Farmers in Southeastern Nigeria”. Farming Systems and Resource Economics in the Tropics. 1995; Vol. (20).
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
548 FASHION AVENUE
NEW YORK, NY 10018
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-688-8931