The Exploration of Biasing Voltage Range on Implantable Microscale Electrochemical Sensors for Post-Surgery Cancer Recurrence Monitoring
American Journal of Chemical Engineering
Volume 3, Issue 6, November 2015, Pages: 74-79
Received: Dec. 11, 2015;
Published: Dec. 11, 2015
Views 4378 Downloads 100
Lidi Jie, Scottish Microelectronics Centre, the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh City, UK
Cancer surgery prognosis currently relies heavily on expensive diagnostics devices that have limited availability to patients. Minute-to-minute cancer recurrence monitoring device is needed. This paper investigates a novel design and simulation of Implantable micro-scale, minute-to-minute sensors of low manufacture cost. In Cadence simulation software, electrochemical sensor array circuit in 0.35 micron complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) process was designed. The simulated circuit supported both pH ISFET sensor and soluble oxygen level O2-FET sensor. The simulation result showed that the circuit’s output voltage has optimal sensitivity when ISFET Vgate was biased at range of 2.29-2.49 volts. The output voltage in this biasing scheme varies linearly with the input voltage Vgate making it ideal region for monitoring of cancer. The appropriate biasing of ISFET Vgate voltage found by simulation is within 2.29-2.49 volts. In the case of pH measurements, the sensitivity can be up to 0.02 pH in a minute-to-minute pH probing device for cancer prognosis tracking. Other chemical probes such as O2-FET and Oct4 sensors are also supported by the device architecture.
The Exploration of Biasing Voltage Range on Implantable Microscale Electrochemical Sensors for Post-Surgery Cancer Recurrence Monitoring, American Journal of Chemical Engineering.
Vol. 3, No. 6,
2015, pp. 74-79.
DeSantis, C. et al., “Cancer Treatment and Survivorship Statistics”, 2014, CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 64 (4), pp. 252-271.
Cumming, D., “ISFET sensor system for real-time detection of extracellular pH oscillations in slime mould”. Electronics Letters, 2012, 48, pp. 144-146.
Corbin, E. et al. “Biophysical properties of human breast cancer cells measured using silicon MEMS resonators and atomic force microscopy”, lab on a chip, 2015, vol. 15. pp. 839-847.
Chen, P., Humayun, M., Tai, Y., “Implantable parylene-based wireless intraocular pressure sensor”. IEEE 21st international conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, 2008: 58–61.
Bergveld, P., “Thirty years of ISFETOLOGY What happened in the past 30 years and what may happen in the next 30 years.” Sensors and Actuators B, 2003, 88: 1–20.
Milgrewa, M., Riehleb, M., Cumming, D. “A large transistor-based sensor array chip for direct extracellular imaging.” Sensors and Actuators B, 2005, 111: 347–353.
Hal, R., Eijkel, J., Bergveld, P. A novel description of ISFET sensitivity with the buffer capacity and double-layer capacitance as key parameters. Sensors and Actuators B, 24-25, 1995, pp. 201-205.
Gerweck, L., Seetharaman, K. cellular pH gradient in tumor versus normal tissue: potential exploration for the treatment of cancer. Cancer Research. 1996, 56 (6):1194-1198.
Wanekaya, A. et al. “Nanowire-Based Electrochemical Biosensors. Electroanalysis” 2006, vol. 18 (6), pp. 533–550.
 Wykoff, C., Beasley, N. et al. Hypoxia-inducible Expression of Tumor-associated Carbonic Anhydrases. Cancer Research. 2000, 60, pp. 7075-7083.
Atlasi, Y., Mowla, S. et al: ‘OCT-4, an embryonic stem cell marker, is highly expressed in bladder cancer’, International Journal of Cancer , 2007, 120, (7), pp. 1598-1602.
Peres, W. et al. “Nanostructured gold dsDNA sensor for early detection of breast cancer by beta protein 1 (BP1)”, Journal of electroanalytical chemistry, 2015; vol. 751 pp. 49-56.