Global Interest Rate Environment with Emphasis on Quantitative Easing Implications
American Journal of BioScience
Volume 5, Issue 4, July 2017, Pages: 59-63
Received: Mar. 2, 2017; Accepted: Mar. 24, 2017; Published: Jun. 1, 2017
Views 2683      Downloads 85
Author
Emmanuel Teitey, Research Department, Noble International Business /Doctoral School, Accra, Ghana
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Constructing global real interest rates at short and long maturities and reviews their evolution since 1980. It also traces the evolution of the cost of capital, It then analyzed key factors that could explained the observed pattern, shift in savings, changes in monetary and fiscal policy, shift in investment demand, changes in relative prices of investment, monetary policy and portfolio shifts between bonds and equity. It closes by considering how the main factors behind the decline in real interest rates might play out in the medium term. Real interest rates and the cost of capital are likely to rise moderately in the medium term from current level. Part of the reason is cyclical, the extremely low real interest rates of recent years reflects large negative output gaps in advanced economies. Indeed, the real interest rates might have declined even further in the absence of the zero lower bound on nominal interest rate.
Keywords
Real, Interest, Nominal, Monetary, Fiscal
To cite this article
Emmanuel Teitey, Global Interest Rate Environment with Emphasis on Quantitative Easing Implications, American Journal of BioScience. Vol. 5, No. 4, 2017, pp. 59-63. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbio.20170504.11
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
Bernanke, B., (2012).The Federal Reserve’s quantitative easing or large scale assets purchase program. www.thedaily economist.com/2012/_09_01 archive.html. Retrieved: October 28th 2016.
[2]
Capistran, C., & Timmermann, A. (2009). Disagreement and biases in inflation expectation. Journal of Money, Credit and banking, (41)366-396.
[3]
Cerra,V., & Saxena, S. C. (2008).Growth dynamics: The myth of economic recovery, American Economic Review. 98(1)439-57.
[4]
Dovern, J., Fritsch, U., & Slacalek, J. (2009). Disagreement among Forecaster in G7 countries, ECB workingpaper1082.
[5]
Eggertsson, G. B., & Woodford, M. (2003). The zero bound on interest rates and optional monetary policy. Brooking Paper on Economic Activity. (1)139-211.
[6]
Harlina, S. J., Intan, R. E., Nasruddin, F., & Emi, N. O. (2011). The economic growth and how effectiveness is the stock market. International Business Journal, 24(6)24-25.
[7]
Lyonnet, V., & Werner, R. A. (2012). Lessons from the Bank of Ghana on quantitative easing and the accountability of the central bank in Japan. Working paper presented at the 15th annual meeting of the annual international conference on macroeconomic analysis and international finance.
[8]
Reinharrt, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S., (2008). Is the U. S. subprime crisis so different? An international historical comparison. Americal Economic Review. 98 (2)339-44.
[9]
Voutsinas, Y., & Werner, R. A.,(2016).Bank runs, deposit instruments and Liquidity. Journal of Political Economy,(2) 26-35.
[10]
Zenith Bank (Ghana) Ltd. (2015a). Z-Business news, Monthly Bulletin, January (100), 2-3.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186