Effects of Color, Pattern, and Sound on the Movement of Houseflies
American Journal of BioScience
Volume 2, Issue 5, September 2014, Pages: 187-191
Received: Aug. 18, 2014; Accepted: Sep. 3, 2014; Published: Sep. 20, 2014
Views 2812      Downloads 232
Authors
Han-Seul Ryu, Korean Minjok Leadership Academy, Hoengseong, Korea
Si-Yun Sung, Korean Minjok Leadership Academy, Hoengseong, Korea
Chae-Won Lim, Korean Minjok Leadership Academy, Hoengseong, Korea
Jong-Uk Na, Korean Minjok Leadership Academy, Hoengseong, Korea
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
As diseases spread by flies have continuously increased in frequency since the 1970s, methods to control the flies’ motion have been studied. In this paper, a novel method is proposed by examining the impact of diverse sensory stimuli on houseflies’ motion. Among various patterns and colors, red striped pattern was the best as fly repellent, and the pattern of white circles on a blue background the best attraction. For sound, a frequency of 10 kHz and 20 kHz had repelling power. When examined for its relationship with the alluring smell of food, red stripes repelled more than 26.3% of flies from the smell. Under the same conditions, 10 kHz and 20 kHz each showed repelling power over about 19% in the presence of an olfactory luring factor. Therefore, the pattern of red stripes and the auditory stimuli of 10 kHz or 20 kHz should be incorporated into various aspects of our lives, along with the living environment of disease-stricken areas.
Keywords
Auditory Stimuli, Fly Repellent, Housefly, ParticleTracker, Pest Control, Visual Stimuli
To cite this article
Han-Seul Ryu, Si-Yun Sung, Chae-Won Lim, Jong-Uk Na, Effects of Color, Pattern, and Sound on the Movement of Houseflies, American Journal of BioScience. Vol. 2, No. 5, 2014, pp. 187-191. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbio.20140205.14
References
[1]
Horváth, G., M. Blahó, G. Kriska, R. Hegedüs, B. Gerics, R. Farkas, and S. Åkesson. (2010). An unexpected advantage of whiteness in horses: the most horsefly-proof horse has a depolarizing white coat. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277(1688): 1643–1650.
[2]
Diclaro, J.W., L.W. Cohnstaedt, R.M. Pereira, S.A. Allan and P.G. Koehler. (2012). Behavioral and physiological response of Musca domestica to colored visual targets. Journal of Medical Entomology, 49 (1): 94-100
[3]
Webb, J.C., C.O. Calkins and D.L. Chambers, W. Schwienbacher, and K. Russ. (1983). Acoustical aspects of behavior of Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata: Analysis and identification of courtship sounds. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 33(1): 1-8.
[4]
Mizrach, A,A. Hetzroni, M. Mazor, R. W. Mankin, T. Ignat, J. Grinshpun, N. D. Epsky, D. Shuman, R. R. Heath. (2005). Acoustic trap for female Mediterranean fruit flies. Transaction of the ASAE 4, 48(5): 2017-2022.
[5]
Egri, Á.,M.Blahó, G. Kriska, R.Farkas, M. Gyurkovszky, S. Åkesson, andG. Horváth. (2012). Polarotactic tabanids find striped patterns with brightness and/or polarization modulation least attractive: an advantage of zebra stripes. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 215(5): 736-745.
[6]
An, Chun-ju, F. Li, L.J. Zhang, D.S. Li, and R.Q. Du. (2005). Effects of ultrasound induction on genomic DNA of housefly larvae. GuangPu XueYu GuangPu Fen Xi, 25(12): 2020-2023.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186