Level of Adoption and Factor Affecting the Level of Adoption Sustainable Soil Management Practices in Ramechhap District, Nepal
American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
Volume 3, Issue 2, March 2015, Pages: 21-24
Received: Jan. 7, 2015; Accepted: Jan. 21, 2015; Published: Mar. 3, 2015
Views 2655      Downloads 208
Authors
Bikal Koirala, Agricultural Economics, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Sciences, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal
Jay Prakash Dutta, Department of Agricultural Economics, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Sciences, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal
Shiva Chandra Dhakal, Department of Agricultural Economics, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Sciences, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal
Krishna Kumar Pant, Department of Agricultural Economics, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Sciences, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
This study investigated the level of adoption and factor affecting the level of adoption of sustainable soil management practices. This research was based on the primary data that was collected in 2012 at Chisapani, Nagdaha and Kathjor VDCs of Ramechhap district of Nepal to analyze the level of adoption and factor affecting the level of adoption of sustainable soil management practices. Pre-tested semi structured interview schedule were used to collect the primary data from 120 farmers, 40 farmers from each VDC by applying simple random sampling technique. The major sustainable soil management practices adopted were found to be improved farm yard manure, improved cattle urine, inclusion of the vegetable and legume in the farming system and use of the bio-pesticide. The level of technology adoption was found to be 79.55% and this shows that the level of adoption was high. The higher level of adoption was due to increase in the production and productivity of the crops and improvement in soil fertility. While considering about the factor affecting the adoption of sustainable soil management practices, the study showed that the five variables namely training, credit, income, livestock standard unit and experience were significantly affecting for higher level of adoption. A unit increase in training, credit, livestock standard unit and experience would increase the probability of level of adoption by 3.48%, 0.83%, 0.45% and 1.1% respectively and a hundred rupees increase in income would increase the probability of level of adoption by 0.0819%.
Keywords
Adoption, Production, Technology, Significantly, Sustainable Soil Management
To cite this article
Bikal Koirala, Jay Prakash Dutta, Shiva Chandra Dhakal, Krishna Kumar Pant, Level of Adoption and Factor Affecting the Level of Adoption Sustainable Soil Management Practices in Ramechhap District, Nepal, American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. Vol. 3, No. 2, 2015, pp. 21-24. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20150302.12
References
[1]
Adhikari, J. (2000). Decisions for farm survival: Farm management strategies in the Mid-hills of Nepal. Adriot Publishers, New Delhi, India. 385p.
[2]
Bayard, B., C.M. Jolly and D.A. Shannon. 2006. The adoption and management of soil conservation practices in Haiti: The case of rock walls. Agricultural Economics Review: 7(2) 28-39.
[3]
Bhusal, D. R.( 2012). Impact of cattle urine use technology on farm income of the vegetable growers of Dhading district, Nepal. Thesis submitted to Tribhuvan University, Nepal. 38p.
[4]
CBS. (2013). Statistical pocket of Nepal. Government of Nepal, Central bureau of statistics, National Planning Commission Secretariat, Thapathali, Kathmandu.
[5]
Karki, K.B. and J.B. Dacayo. (1990). Assessment of land degredation in southern Lalitpur of Nepal. Proceedings of 14th Congress of International Society of Social Sciences, Tokyo, Japan. 38p.
[6]
Jayasawal, M. L., B. N. Regmi, T. R. Noor, A Mcleod and J, Best. (2001). Using livestock to improve the livelihoods of landless and refugee affected livestock keepers in Bagladesh and Nepal. DFID. pp. 31-33.
[7]
MoAD. (2012). Statistical information on Nepalese Agriculture. Ministry of Agriculture Development, Singh Durbar, Kathmandu, Nepal.
[8]
Onweremadu, E.U. and E.C. Matthews. (2007). Adoption level and sources of soil management practices in low- input agriculture. Nature and Science 5(1) 39:45.
[9]
Pretty, J. & R. Hine. (2001). Reducing food poverty with sustainable agriculture: a summary of new evidence. UK: University of Essex Centre for Environment and Society. 24p.
[10]
Pretty, J.N., A. D. Noble, D. Bossio, J. Dixon, R. E. Hine, F. W. T. Penning de Vries and J. I. L Morison. (2006). Resource-conserving agriculture increases yields in developing countries. Environmental Science and Technology (Policy Analysis) 40(4): 1114-1119.
[11]
Rezvanfar, A., A. Samiee and E. Faham. (2009). Analyse of factor affecting adoption of sustainable soil conservation practices among wheat growers. World Applied Science of Journal 6(5): 644-651.
[12]
Romano, D., E. Mane, M. D. Errico and L. Ellinovi. (2010). Livelihoods stragegies and household resilience to food insecurity: An empirical analusis to Kenya. European Report Development, Rome, Italy. pp. 15-25
[13]
USDA. (1990). Debate on sustainability and development. USDA Bulletin, American Congress.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186