Responses of Chlorophyll a Content for Conchocelis Phase of Alaskan Porphyra (Bangiales,Rhodophyta) Species to Environmental Factors
Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering
Volume 1, Issue 1, June 2013, Pages: 28-39
Received: Jun. 1, 2013; Published: Jun. 30, 2013
Views 2986      Downloads 160
Authors
Rulong Lin, Key Laboratory of Global Change and Marine-Atmospheric Chemistry, State OceanicAdministration, and Third Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Xiamen 361005, China
Michael Steven Stekoll, Juneau Center, School of Fisheries and Ocean Science, University of Alaska, 11120 Glacier Highway, Juneau, AK99801, U.S.A
Article Tools
PDF
Follow on us
Abstract
Investigations were performed on variations of photosynthetic pigment in conchocelis of Alaskan Porphyra species, P. abbottae (Pa), P. pseudolanceolata (Pe), P. pseudolinearis (Pi) and P. torta (Pt), in response to environmental variables. Conchocelis were cultured under varying conditions of irradiance (0, 10, 40 and 160 µmol photons m-2s-1), nutrient concentration (0, f/4, f/2 and f) for up to 60 days (with temperature 11°C and salinity 30ppt). Chlorophyll a (Chl a ) content was measured by spectrophotometry. Results indicated that Chl content varied with different culture conditions and species. Photosynthetic pigment was significantly affected by irradiance, nutrient concentration and culture duration, including some interactions of major factors for different species. Light had the most obvious influence on pigment content. For all four species and culture conditions tested, the higher Chl a content (3.6-8.6 mg/g.dw) generally occurred at 0-10 µmol photons m 2 s 1than at higher irradiances (≥40 µmol photons m-2s-1 ) culture. For all culture conditions, Chl a content in conchocelis culture with no nutrients added was the lowest. Although there was some difference in Chl a content for cultures with f/2-f nutrient concentration, it was not statistically significant. ANOVA results showed that culture duration had influence on Chl a content of Pa, Pe and Pi species. However, pooled data analysis indicated there was no obvious difference in Chl content for four species of 10-60day culture. There were significant differences in photosynthetic pigment content for different species. Pa and Pi produced much higher pigment content than the other two species responding to different environmental conditions. Maximal Chl. a content (8.6 mg/g.dw) for Pa occurred at 0 µmol photons m-2s-1, f/2 nutrient concentration and 10 day culture duration. Pt contained the lowest pigment content for all culture conditions. Photosynthetic pigment remained relatively higher content under the complete darkness or the low irradiance continuously as long as 60 days for all tested species, which demonstrated the unique survival feature of Porphyra conchocelis. Variation patterns of pigment content, ecological significance and adaptation strategy to low or dark light conditions for microscopic conchocelis stage of Porphyra were discussed.
Keywords
Porphyra, Conchocelis, Photosynthetic Pigment, Chlorophyll A, Irradiance, Temperature, Nutrient, Environmental Factor, Alaska
To cite this article
Rulong Lin, Michael Steven Stekoll, Responses of Chlorophyll a Content for Conchocelis Phase of Alaskan Porphyra (Bangiales,Rhodophyta) Species to Environmental Factors, Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering. Vol. 1, No. 1, 2013, pp. 28-39. doi: 10.11648/j.abb.20130101.14
References
[1]
Lindstrom. S. C. & K. M. Cole, 1992. A revision of the species of Porphyra (Rhodophyta: Bangiales) occurring in British Columbia and adjacent waters. Can. J. Bot. 70: 2066-2075.
[2]
Stekoll, M. S., 1998. The seaweed resources of Alaska. In M. Ohno & A. T. Critchley (eds), Seaweed Resources of the World. Japan International Cooperation Agency, Tokyo: 258-265.
[3]
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2010. Global Production Statistics 1950–2006. Available at: http:// www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/global-aquaculture-production/ query/en (last accessed 9 December 2010).
[4]
Buchholz, C.M., G. Krause, & B.H. Buck. 2012. Seaweed and Man. Seaweed Biology Ecological Studies. 219: 471-493.
[5]
Okai, Y., Hiqashi Okai, K., Yano, Y., & Otani, S. 1996. Identification of antimutagenic substances in an extract of edible red alga, Porphyra tenera (Asadusa-nori). Cancer Letters. 100: 235–240.
[6]
Pereira, R., C. Yarish, & A. T. Critchley. 2013. Seaweed Aquaculture for Human Foods in Land-Based and IMTA Systems. Sustainable Food Production. 1405-1424.
[7]
Rulong Lin & Michael S. Stekoll. 2011. Phycobilin content of the conchocelis phase of Alaskan Porphyra (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) species: Responses to environmental variables. J. Phycol. 47: 208–214.
[8]
Yabuta, Y., Fujimura, H., Kwak, C. S., Enomoto, T., & Watanabe, F. 2010. Antioxidant activity of the phycoerythrobilin compound formed from a dried Korean purple laver (Porphyra sp.) during in vitro digestion. Food Science and Technology Research. 16: 347–352.
[9]
Yasuji Okai, Kiyoka Higashi-Okai, Yoshihisa Yano, Shuzo Otani. 1996. Identification of antimutagenic substances in an extract of edible red alga, Porphyra tenera (Asadusa-nori) Cancer Letters.100(1-2): 235-240.
[10]
Akpan, E. B. & Farrow, G. E. 1984. Shell-boring algae on the Scottish continental shelf: identification, distribution, bathymetriczonation. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 75:1–12.
[11]
Farrow, G. E. & Clokie, J. 1979. Molluscan grazing of sublittoral algal-bored shells and the production of carbonate mudin the Firth of Clyde, Scotland. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 70:139–48.
[12]
Gantt, E., G. M. Berg, D. Bhattacharya et al. 2010. Porphyra: Complex life histories in a harsh environment: P. umbilicalis, an intertidal red alga for genomic analysis. Red Algae in the Genomic Age, Cellular Origin, Life in Extreme Habitats and Astrobiology. 13: 129–148.
[13]
Martinez, E. 1990. The conchocelis-phase of Porphyra (Rhodophyta) in the intertidal of San Juan Island, Washington, USA. Phycologia.29:391–5.
[14]
Nielsen, R. 1987. Marine algae within calcareous shells from New Zealand. N. Z. J. Bot. 25:425–38.
[15]
He, P. & C. Yarish.2006. The developmental regulation of mass cultures of free-living conchocelis for commercial net seeding of Porphyra leucosticta from Northeast AmericaAquaculture. 257:373–381.
[16]
Stekoll, M. S., Lin, R. & Lindstrom, S. C. 1999. Porphyra cultivation in Alaska: conchocelis growth of three indigenous species. Hydrobiologia 398/399:291-7.
[17]
Amano, H. & Noda, H. 1978. Photosynthetic pigments of five kinds of laver, ‘‘nori.’’ Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish. 44:911–6.
[18]
Figueroa, F. L., Aguilera, J. & Niell, F. X. 1995. Red and blue light regulation of growth and photosynthetic metabolism in Porphyra umbilicalis (Bangiales, Rhodophyta). Eur. J. Phycol. 30: 11–8.
[19]
Fujita, Y. & Migita, S. 1984. Photosynthetic pigments of the different color types of Porphyra yezoensis Ueda and P. tenera Kjellman. Bull. Fac. Fish. 56:7–13.
[20]
S. Abe, A. Kurashima , Y. Yokohama and J. Tanaka. 2001. The cellular ability of desiccation tolerance in Japanese intertidal seaweeds. Bot. Mar. 44:125–131
[21]
Conway, E. & Cole, K. 1977. Studies in the Bangiaceae: structure and reproduction of the conchocelis of Porphyra and Bangia in culture (Bangiales, Rhodophyceae). Phycologia 16:205–16.
[22]
Chang, S. D., Chin, P. & Park, K. Y. 1983. Effects of temperature, salinity and clay on the rate of photosynthesis of laver, Porphyra yezoensis. Bull. Korean Fish. Soc. 16:335–40.
[23]
Herbert, S. K. 1984. Acclimation to light intensity in a winter and a summer species of Porphyra. J. Phycol. 20 (Suppl. 1):4.
[24]
Gao, K. & Aruga, Y. 1987. Preliminary studies on the photosynthesis and respiration of Porphyra yezoensis under emersed conditions. J. Tokyo Univ. Fish. 47:51–65.
[25]
Gao, S. & Zhao, H. 1988. Studies on acid tolerance of Porphyra and Ulva. Effects of different pH on the photosynthesis and cellular structure of Porphyra yezoensis and Ulva pertusa. Oceanol. Limnol. Sin. 19:87–92.
[26]
Gao, K., Aruga, Y., Asada, K., Ishihara, T. & Kiyohara, M. 1991. Enhanced growth of the red alga Porphyra yezoensis Ueda in high CO2 concentrations. J. Appl. Phycol. 3:355–62.
[27]
Kapraun, D. F. & Lemus, A. J. 1987. Field and culture studies of Porphyra spiralis var. amplifolia Olivera Filho et Coll (Bangiales,Rhodophyta) from Isla de Margarita, Venezuela. Bot. Mar.30:483–90.
[28]
Lipkin, Y., Beer, S. & Eshel, A. 1993. The ability of Porphyra linearis (Rhodophyta) to tolerate prolonged period of desiccation. Bot. Mar. 36:517–23.
[29]
Niwa, K. et al. 2005. Morphological and molecular analysis of the endangered species Porphyra tenera (Bangiales, Rhodophyta). J. Phycol., 41:294–304.
[30]
Pereira, R., Sousa-Pinto, I. & Yarish, C. 2004. Field and culture studies of the life history of Porphyra dioica (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) from Portugal. Phycologia. 43:756–67.
[31]
Wiencke, C. & Clayton, M. N. 1998. The life history of Porphyra endiviifolium from the South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Polar Biol. 19:257–63.
[32]
Tang, X., Jiang, H., Fei, X. & Yarish, C. 2004. New life cycles of Porphyra katadae var. hemiphylla in culture. J. Appl. Phycol. 16:505–11.
[33]
Holmes, M. J. & Brodie, J. 2005. Phenology and the life history in culture of Porphyra leucosticta (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) from Britain. Bot. Mar. 48:218–30.
[34]
Monotilla, W. & M.. Notoya. 2004. Morphological and physiological responses of Porphyra suborbiculata Kjellman (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) blades from five localities. Bot. Mar., 47: 323–334.
[35]
Christopher D. Neefus, Arthur C. Mathieson1, Troy L. Bray1, Charles Yarish. 2008. The distribution, morphology, and ecology of three introduced Asiatic species of Porphyra (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) in the Northwestern Atlantic. J. Phycol., 44(6): 1399–1414.
[36]
Priya Sampath-Wiley, Christopher D. Neefus and Leland S. Jahnke. 2008. Seasonal effects of sun exposure and emersion on intertidal seaweed physiology: fluctuations in antioxidant contents, photosynthetic pigments and photosynthetic efficiency in the red alga Porphyra umbilicalis Kützing (Rhodophyta, Bangiales). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 361(2):83–91.
[37]
Korbee, N., F. L. Figueroa & J. Aguilera. 2005. Effect of light quality on the accumulation of photosynthetic pigments, proteins and mycosporine-like amino acids in the red alga Porphyra leucosticta (Bangiales, Rhodophyta). Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 80(2): 71-78.
[38]
Kursar, T.A., J.P. van der Meer & R.S. Alberte. 1983. Light-harvesting system of the red alga Gracilaria tikvahiae. Plant Physiol. (Bethesda). 73:353-360.
[39]
McLachlan, J. 1973. Growth media–marine. In Stein, J. R. [Ed.]Handbook of Phycological Methods. Culture Methods and Growth Measurements. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK,pp. 25–51.
[40]
O'hEocha,C. 1971. Pigments of the Red Algae. In Barnes, H. [Ed.] Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann.Rev. George Allen and Unwin Ltd., London. 9: pp. 61-82.
[41]
Statistical Sciences Inc. 2000. S-Plus for Windows Version 4.5. Seattle,Washington.
[42]
Zar,J.H. 2010. Biostatistical analysis the fifth edition, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA. 960pp.
[43]
Hannach, G. 1989. Spectral light absorption by intact blades of Porphyra abbottae (Rhodophyta): effects of environmental factors in culture. J. Phycol. 25:522-529.
[44]
Fortes, M.D. & K. Luning. 1980. Growth rates of North Sea macroalgae in relation to temperature, irradiance and photoperiod. Helgolander Meeresuntersuchungen. 34: 15-29.
[45]
Waaland, J.R., S.D. Waaland & G. Bates. 1974. Chloroplast structure and pigment composition in the red alga Griffithsia pacifica: regulation by light intensity. J. Phycol. 10:193-199.
[46]
Zavodnik, N. 1987. Seasonal variations in the rate of photosynthetic activity and chemical composition of the littoral seaweeds Ulva rigida and Porphyra leucostcta. Bot. Mar. 30 (1): 71-82.
[47]
Grobe, C.W., C. Yarish & I.R. Davison. 1998. Nitrogen: a critical requirement for Porphyra aquaculture. World Aquaculture. 6: 34-35.
[48]
Kim, J.K., Kraemer G.P., Neefus C.D., Chung I.K. and Yarish C. 2007. The effects of temperature and ammonium on growth, pigment production and nitrogen uptake in four species of Porphyra native to the coast of New England. J. Appl. Phycol., 19:431–440.
[49]
Jang K. Kim, George P. Kraemer, Charles Yarish. 2009. Comparison of growth and nitrate uptake by New England Porphyra species from different tidal elevations in relation to desiccation. Phycol. Res., 57(2):152–157.
[50]
N. Korbee, P. Huovinen, F. L. Figueroa, J. Aguilera and U. Karsten. 2005. Availability of ammonium influences photosynthesis and the accumulation of mycosporine-like amino acids in two Porphyra species (Bangiales, Rhodophyta).Mar. Biol., 146:645–654.
[51]
Korbee, N., F. L. Figueroa & J. Aguilera. 2010. Effect of nutrient supply on photosynthesis and pigmentation to short-term stress (UV radiation) in Gracilaria conferta (Rhodophyta). Marine Pollution Bulletin. 60(10): 1768-1778.
[52]
Lapointe, B.E. & J. Ryther. 1979. The effects of nitrogen and seawater flow rate on the growth and biochemical composition of Gracilaria foliifera var. angustissima in mass outdoor cultures. Bot. Mar. 22:529-537.
[53]
Meiqin, C., Z. Baofu & W. Jicheng. 1979. The influence of different nitrogenous fertilizers on the growth and development of the conchocelis of Porphyra yezoensis. Oceanol. Limnol. Sin. 10 (1): 45.
[54]
Rui Pereiraac, George Kraemerd, Charles Yarishc & Isabel Sousa-Pintoab. 2008. Nitrogen uptake by gametophytes of Porphyra dioica (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) under controlled-culture conditions. Eur. J. Phycol., 43(1):107–118.
[55]
Wheeler, P.A. & W.J. North. 1980. Effect of nitrogen supply on nitrogen content and growth rate of juvenile Macrocystis pyrifera (Phaeophyta) sporophytes. J. Phycol. 16: 577-582
[56]
Mario, G., Ferruzzi, J. Blakeslee. Digestion, absorption, and cancer preventative activity of dietary chlorophyll derivatives. Nutrition Research, 27(1): 1-12.
[57]
Hafting, J.T., Alan T. Critchley, M. Lynn Cornish et al., 2012.On-land cultivation of functional seaweed products for human usage. Journal of Applied Phycology.24(3): 385-392.
[58]
Rindi, F., A. Soler-Vila & M. D. Guiry. 2012. Taxonomy of Marine Macroalgae Used as Sources of Bioactive Compounds. Marine Bioactive Compounds. 1-53.
[59]
Holdt, S. L., & S. Kraan. 2011. Bioactive compounds in seaweed: functional food applications and legislation. Journal of Applied Phycology.23(3): 543-597.
[60]
Pangestutia, R. & S. K. Kim. 2011. Biological activities and health benefit effects of natural pigments derived from marine algae. J. Functional Foods. (3): 255-266.
[61]
Lanfer-Marquez, U. M., R. Barros & P. Sinnecker. 2005.Antioxidant activity of chlorophylls and their derivatives. Food Research International. 38: 885–891.
[62]
Maeda, H., Hosokawa, M., Sashima, T., & Miyashita, K. 2008. Antiobesity effect of fucoxanthin from edible seaweeds and its multibiological functions. Functional food and health. 376–388.
[63]
Bohn, T. 2008. Bioavailability of non-provitamin A carotenoids. Current Nutrition and Food Science. 4: 240–258.
[64]
Cho, M. L., Lee, H. S., Kang, I. J., Won, M. H., & You, S. G. 2011. Antioxidant properties of extract and fractions from Enteromorpha prolifera, a type of green seaweed. Food Chemistry.127: 999–1006.
[65]
Cornish, M., & Garbary, D. 2010. Antioxidants from macroalgae: Potential applications in human health and nutrition. Algae. 25: 155–171.
[66]
Ferruzzi, M. G., & Blakeslee, J. 2007. Digestion, absorption, and cancer preventative activity of dietary chlorophyll derivatives. Nutrition Research. 27: 1–12.
[67]
Sachindra, N., Sato, E., Maeda, H., Hosokawa, M., Niwano, Y., Kohno, M., et al. 2007. Radical scavenging and singlet oxygen quenching activity of marine carotenoid fucoxanthin and its metabolites. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 55:8516–8522.
[68]
Sekar, S., & Chandramohan, M. 2008. Phycobiliproteins as a commodity: Trends in applied research, patents and commercialization. Journal of Applied Phycology, 20: 113–136.
[69]
Shahidi, F. 2008. Bioactives from marine resources. In ACS symposium series (pp. 24–34). ACS Publications.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186