Exploring Denial-Correction Pairings in Major Applied Linguistics Textbooks
International Journal of Education, Culture and Society
Volume 2, Issue 1, February 2017, Pages: 20-32
Received: Nov. 27, 2016; Accepted: Jan. 24, 2017; Published: Mar. 2, 2017
Views 1600      Downloads 113
Authors
Babak Majidzadeh, Department of Teaching English as a Foreign Language, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
Abdol Majid Hayati, Department of TEFL, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Denial and correction as a subcategory of basic clause relations is of crucial importance in a host of research in written textual analysis. Yet investigating potential various patterns construing denial-correction pairing has long been neglected. Following Pagano (2004) and Winter’s (2004) ideas concerning denials, the current study aimed to investigate dc-pairing patterns in a corpus of textbooks in Applied Linguistics taught at MA and PhD levels. The study revealed the existence of 12 patterns that were frequently used in the corpus. It was also found that there was a significant difference between dc-pairing patterns used in the MA and the PhD textbooks in terms of the frequency of the use of the patterns. The study also found other functions for dc-pairing patterns in the corpus.
Keywords
Denial-Correction Pairings, Heteroglossia, Contractive, Existential Paradigm
To cite this article
Babak Majidzadeh, Abdol Majid Hayati, Exploring Denial-Correction Pairings in Major Applied Linguistics Textbooks, International Journal of Education, Culture and Society. Vol. 2, No. 1, 2017, pp. 20-32. doi: 10.11648/j.ijecs.20170201.14
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. The dialogic imagination (translated by C. Emerson & M. Holquist) Austin: University of Texas Press.
[2]
Brazil, D. (1985). The communicative value of intonation in English, Discourse Monographs No. 8, Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
[3]
Cohen, G., Eysenck, M. W., & Le Voi, M. E. (1986). Memory: A cognitive approach. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
[4]
Collins Cobuild Advanced Dictionary of English. (2015). Harper Collins Publishers.
[5]
Connor, U., & Mauranen, A. (1999). Linguistic analysis of grant proposals: European union research grants. English for Specific Purposes 18 (1), 47-62.
[6]
Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional Linguistic. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
[7]
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
[8]
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Hodder Arnold.
[9]
Hatch, E., & Farhady, H. (2007). Research design and statistics for applied linguistics. Tehran: Rahnama Publications.
[10]
Hyland, K. (2000) Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.
[11]
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 13: 133-151.
[12]
Hyland, K., (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. New York: Continuum.
[13]
Hyland, K. and Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: a reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25 (2), (pp. 156-77).
[14]
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2008). Understanding language teaching: From method to post-method. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[15]
Mackey, A. (2012). Input, interaction and corrective feedback in L2 learning. Oxford: OUP.
[16]
Martin, J. R. & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
[17]
Miller, G. & Johnson-Laird, P. (1976). Language and perception, Cambridge: CUP.
[18]
Pagano, A. (2004). Negatives in written text. In M. Coulthard (Ed.). Advances in written text analysis (pp. 250-265). New York: Routledge.
[19]
Poutsma, H. (1926). A grammar of late modern English. Groningen: Nordhoff.
[20]
Tottie, G. (1982). Where do negatives come from? Studia Linguistica 36/1, (pp. 88–105).
[21]
Tottie, G. (1987). Rejections, denials and explanatory statements - a reply to Fretheim, Studia Linguistica 41/2, (pp. 154–63).
[22]
Widdowson, H. G. (1979). Explorations in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[23]
Williams, J, M. (1981). Style: Ten lessons in clarity and grace. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[24]
Winter, E. O. (2004). Clause relations as information structure: Two basic text structures in English. In M. Coulthard (Ed.). Advances in written text analysis (pp. 46-68). New York: Routledge.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186