Evaluation of Low Cost Drip Irrigation Technology Through Tomato Production: In Adami Tulu JidoKombolcha District, Mid-Rift Valley of Ethiopia
International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management
Volume 2, Issue 2, March 2017, Pages: 32-37
Received: Sep. 29, 2016;
Accepted: Feb. 3, 2017;
Published: Mar. 15, 2017
Views 1899 Downloads 135
Abay Challa, Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center, Zeway, Ethiopia
Zelalem Shelemew, Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center, Zeway, Ethiopia
Anbase Ambonsa, Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center, Zeway, Ethiopia
Evaluation of low cost drip irrigation technology was carried out under soil and agro climatic condition of Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center, on-station so as to see its performance as compared to furrow irrigation systems for increased tomato productions. Four improved tomato verities were used for the purpose as test crop. The trials were replicated four times in a randomized block design. Some parameters of tomato and water use efficiency were used to compare the performance of the two irrigation systems. There was observed difference in some parameters of tomato under the two irrigation systems. Some tomato varieties perform well under drip while other performs well under furrow. But, the overall effect showed that drip irrigation system performed better than furrow irrigation system. Relatively higher mean yield of tomato was recorded under drip irrigation systems; 44.09 ton/ha for drip as compared to 43.38 ton/ha in surface irrigation. Drip irrigation used less water than that of surface irrigation systems, thus, giving much higher water use efficiencies. It was concluded that low cost drip systems achieved water saving of more than 25.9 as compared to surface irrigation systems. Finally this technology needs further evaluation under farmer circumstance for better finding.
Evaluation of Low Cost Drip Irrigation Technology Through Tomato Production: In Adami Tulu JidoKombolcha District, Mid-Rift Valley of Ethiopia, International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management.
Vol. 2, No. 2,
2017, pp. 32-37.
Ali, M. H., M. R. Hoque, A. A. Hassan, and A. Khair. 2007. Effects of deficit irrigation on yield, water productivity and economic returns of wheat. Agricultural Water Management 92:151-161.
Baye, B., 2011. Effect of mulching and amount of water on the yield of tomato under drip irrigation. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry 3 (7), pp. 200-206.
Chandra A. M. and J. Morrison, 2013. Advances and Challenges with Micro-Irrigation. Irrig. and Drain. 62: 255–261.
Chernet, S., D. Belew and F. Abay, 2013. Genetic variability and association of characters in tomato (Solanumlcopersicon L.) genotypes in Northern Ethiopia. Int. J. Agric. Res., 8: 67-76.
Desalegne, L., 2002. Tomatoes: Researchexperience and production prospects. Research reports No43, Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, pp: 1-15.
Fekadu Y, Teshome T. 1998. Effect of drip and furrow irrigation and plant spacing on yield of tomato at Dire Dawa, Ethiopia. Agricultural Water Management 35: 201–207.
FassilEshetu, KassaTadele and SelemonNega, 2004. Micro Tube Drip Irrigation. A Report.
FAO, 1997. Small-scale irrigation for arid zones: Principles and options.
Gawad, G. A., Arslan, A., Gaihbe, A., and Kadouri, F., 2005. The effects of saline irrigation water management and salt tolerant tomato varieties on sustainable production of tomato in Syria. Agricultural Water Management 78: 39–53.
Isaya V. Sijali, 2001. Drip Irrigation. Options for smallholder farmers in eastern and southern Africa. Published by Sida’s Regional and Land Management Unit.
Jiregna, T. D., 2013. “Evaluation of agronomic performance and Lycopene variation in tomato (Lycopersicomesculentum Mill.) genotypes in Mizan, Southern Ethiopia.” World Applied Sciences Journal, 27 (11), 1450-1454.
Meseret, D. R., Ali, M. and Kassahun, B, 2012. “Evaluation of tomato (Lycopersiconesculentum Mill.) genotypesfor yield and yield components,” Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology, Global science books.
Muhammad, Y. S., Muhammed, A. and Qumer, I., 2013. “Augmented analysis for yield and some yield components in tomato (Lycopersicomesculentum Mill.),” Pak. J. Bot., 45 (1), 215-218.
Pawar DD, Bhoi PG, Shinde SH. 2002. Effect of irrigation methods and fertilizer levels on yield of potato. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 72 (2): 80–83.
Ragassa, M. D., A. Mohammed and K. Bantte, 2012. Evaluation of tomato (Lycopersicomesclentum mill.) genotypes for yield and yield components. Afr. J. plant Sci. Biotechnol., 6:45-49.
Raina JN, Thakur BC, Bhandaria R, 1998. Effect of drip irrigation and plastic mulch on yield, water use efficiency and benefit-cost ratio of pea cultivation. Indian J. Soil Sci.
Satyendra K., Rajbir S., M. J. Kaledhonkar, D. D. Nangare and Ashwani K., 2013. Improving Water Productivity Through Micro-Irrigation In Arid Punjab Regions. Irrig. and Drain. 62: 330–339.
Shah S. K., 2011. Towards Adopting Nanotechnology in Irrigation: Micro Irrigation Systems. India Water Portal: Karnataka, India.
Shushay C., Derbew B. and Fetien A, “Performance Evaluation and Path Analysis Studies in Tomato (Solanumlycopersiconl.) Genotpes under Humera, Northern Ethiopia Condition.” World Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 2, no. 6 (2014): 267-271. doi: 10.12691/wjar-2-6-3.
Teshome Abdissa, Nigusse Dechassa and Yibekal Alemayehu, 2012. Sweet potato growth parameter as affected by farm manure and phosphorus application at Adami Tulu agricultural research center central rift valley of Ethiopia. Agricultural science journal 2 (1):1-12.
Zaman WU, Arshad M, Saleem K, 2001. Distribution of nitrate nitrogen in the soil profile under different irrigation methods. International, J. Agri. Biol., 2: 208-9.