American Journal of Applied Psychology
Volume 5, Issue 6, November 2016, Pages: 77-84
Received: Oct. 30, 2016;
Accepted: Dec. 16, 2016;
Published: Dec. 29, 2016
Views 2662 Downloads 113
Arcady A. Putilov, Research Institute for Molecular Biology and Biophysics, Novosibirsk, Russia
There exists a clear distinguishable personality variation along a big amount of dimensions, such as dependability, honesty, cooperativeness, generousness, humorousness, friendliness, competitiveness, and so on. The practice of classification of trait words indicates that each original list consisting of hundreds of these words of personality lexicon can be replaced by 5-6 broad factorial dimensions. Usually, the personality psychologists do not explain the nature of such empirically derived personality traits structures. Instead, they often stress that neither theory is supported by such factorial models of personality traits structure due to their pure empirical origin. The author proposed a three-dimensional (“rugby cake”) model allowing the replacement of a six-factor representation of personality traits structure by a more parsimonious representation with only three spatial (underlying) dimensions named Advantageousness (A), Benignity (B), and Controllability (C). In the present paper he proposed that the human capability to distinguish between numerous personality traits dimensions evolved as an essential life skill determined by a relatively autonomous, automatic, and specialized computational device. This device makes nearly everyone well enough in navigating between hundreds of narrow personality traits dimensions without much effort and outside of awareness. People can unconsciously organize the personality perception process in the framework of a very parsimonious three-dimensional ABC system. It provides a sense to which extent a particular narrow personality trait is advantageous (A), benign (B), and controlled (C) to solve the adaptive problems of predicting and controlling others’ behavior via perception, classification, judgment, and signaling of fitness correlated personality traits.
Arcady A. Putilov,
Personality Traits Structuring Can Lead to Uncovering Its Adaptive Function, American Journal of Applied Psychology.
Vol. 5, No. 6,
2016, pp. 77-84.
Copyright © 2016 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52: 81-90.
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative "Description of Personality": The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59: 1216-1229.
Almagor, M., Tellegen, A., & Waller, N. (1995). The Big Seven model: A cross-cultural replication and further exploration of the basic dimensions of natural language of trait descriptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69: 300–307.
De Raad, B., Perugini, M., Hrebickova, M., & Szarota, P. (1998). Lingua franca of personality: Taxonomies and structures based on the psycholexical approach. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 29: 212-232.
Saucier, G. (2003). An alternative multi-language structure for personality attributes. European Journal of Personality 17 (3): 179-205.
Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., de Vries, R. E., Di Blas, L., Boies, K., and De Raad, B. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86: 356-366.
Hogan, R. (1983). Socioanalytic theory of personality. In M. M. Page (Ed.), 1982 Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Personality—current theory and research (pp. 55-89). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Hogan, R. (1996). A socioanalytic perspective on the Five-Factor Model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.) The Five-Factor Model of Personality: Theoretical Perspectives (pp. 163–179). New York: Guilford Press.
Putilov, A. A. (2010). Geometry of Individual Variation in Personality and Sleep-Wake Adaptability. (Series: Psychology Research Progress). Nova Science Pub Inc, New York, 270 pp.
Putilov A. A. (2016). Three-dimensional structural representation of the sleep-wake adaptability. Chronobiology International, 33 (2): 169-180.
Putilov, A. A. (2017). A 3-D look at the Russian personality traits structure. Current Psychology, 36: DOI: 10.1007/s12144-016-9535-y (online first: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12144-016-9535-y?wt_mc=Internal.Event.1.SEM.ArticleAuthorOnlineFirst)
Tooby, J. and Cosmides L. (1990). On the universality of human nature and the uniqueness of the individual: The role of genetics and adaptation. Journal of Personality 58: 17–67.
Sefcek, J. A., Brumbach, B. H., Vásquez, G., and Miller, G. F. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of human mate choice: How ecology, genes, fertility, and fashion influence our mating behavior. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality 18 (2/3): 125-182.
Buss, D. M. (1996). Social adaptation and five major factors of personality. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.) The Five-factor Model of Personality: Theoretical Perspectives (pp. 180-207). New York: Guilford.
Buss, D. M. (2009). How Can Evolutionary Psychology Successfully Explain Personality and Individual Differences? Perspectives on Psychological Science 4: 359-366.