Giddens' View of Trust and Its Revelation in Sight of Knowledge
Social Sciences
Volume 8, Issue 1, February 2019, Pages: 1-5
Received: Aug. 22, 2018; Accepted: Sep. 17, 2018; Published: Jan. 19, 2019
Views 239      Downloads 46
Authors
Fu Yanlei, School of Marxism, Huzhou University, Huzhou, China
Su Minyan, School of Marxism, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
This paper analyzes the mechanism of "trust" in Giddens' horizon. There have been many perspectives of attention and research about the causes and mechanisms of trust, such as moral quality, values and institutional culture. Giddens, as the famous English socialist, used "knowledge" as an analytical tool to generalize and refine the existing research, basing on the special social relationship of “expert-layman”. He put forward two hypotheses about the establishment of trust. One was the possibility of trust coming into being by the asymmetry of knowledge; the other was the necessity of trust shaping by the certainty of knowledge. In modern society, these two factors are difficult to reverse, but can be rationally used. According to Giddens' logic, the various phenomenon of the instability of trust in China now can be attributed to the weakness of both the two conditions. Because China has entered the information age, and knowledge has been expanding rapidly. In order to solve these problems, basing on the “knowledge” angle, it is important to keep a rational view of the phenomenon of instability of trust from the vertical dimension, and create a relatively stable subjective and objective environment from the horizontal dimension, avoiding two extremes of trust: blind trust and skepticism.
Keywords
Knowledge, Giddens, View of Trust
To cite this article
Fu Yanlei, Su Minyan, Giddens' View of Trust and Its Revelation in Sight of Knowledge, Social Sciences. Vol. 8, No. 1, 2019, pp. 1-5. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20190801.11
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
Wang Jue. 2018. Ethical response to trust in modern society. Social Sciences in China. No. 03. pp 59-65.
[2]
Hao Yuqing. 2017. Reasons of the political distrust in present China’s social transformation——an analysis from the perspective of the political culture. Journal of Jiangxi Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) Vol. 50. pp 11-16.
[3]
Jiang Dianyang. 2018. On the dilemma and reconstruction of the social trust in the background of “stranger society”, Gansu Theory Research. No. 03, pp111-116.
[4]
Xu Xu; Xin Jin. 2018. The autocratic roots of social distrust. Journal of Comparative Economics. Vol. 46. pp 362-380.
[5]
Stijn Daenekindt; Jeroen van der Waal; Willem de Koster. 2018. Social mobility and political distrust: cults of gratitude and resentment? Acta Politica, Vol. 53, pp 269-282.
[6]
Anthony Giddens. 2011. The consequences of modernity. Nanjing: Yilin Press. pp 24-78.
[7]
Anthony Giddens. 2003. In defence of sociology essays. Beijing: Social Science Academic Press. p40.
[8]
Slavoj Žižek. 2002. The sublime object of ideology. Beijing: Central Compilation & Translation Press. p51.
[9]
Ulrich Beck, Anthony Giddens and Scott Lash. 2001. Reflexive modernization politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Beijing: Commercial Press, pp 108-110.
[10]
G Primiero, F Raimondi, M Bottone, J Tagliabue. 2017. Trust and distrust in contradictory information transmission, Applied Network Science. No. 2 (1), p12.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186