Socio-Cultural Factors to Breaking through the Glass Ceiling: A Case Study of University of Ghana, Legon
Volume 3, Issue 5, October 2014, Pages: 170-176
Received: Oct. 16, 2014;
Accepted: Oct. 29, 2014;
Published: Nov. 20, 2014
Views 3249 Downloads 173
Hannah Benedicta Taylor-Abdulai, Accra Polytechnic, Accra, Ghana
Lipsey Samuel Appiah-Kwapong, Accra Polytechnic, Accra, Ghana
Grace Sintim-Adasi, Accra Polytechnic, Accra, Ghana
Emelia Sarpong, Accra Polytechnic, Accra, Ghana
Akosua Darkwa, Department of Sociology, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana
The study looked at socio-cultural factors that impede women faculty career progress. A total of 142 faculties made up of 33 females and 109 males were sampled for the study using a stratified sampling strategy from the faculties, schools and institutes. Using a mixed method, the study compared male and female faculty of the University of Ghana, Legon using a proxy of roles and responsibilities both at home to find out which gender has more responsibilities in taking care of family and home. The findings in the study show the prevalence of subtle gender discrimination mechanisms that hinder women’s opportunities for career advancement and other career opportunities. The study shows that the university does not effectively create the necessary conditions to support mothers with children under two years. The invisibility of female faculty is as a result of their roles as wives and mothers, which invariably leaves them with little or no time to participate in informal networks. The study found that many women than men experience conflict regarding their ability to simultaneously play the role of wife, mother and worker. The study recommends that in order for the University of Ghana, Legon to retain those women who are already in the system, it is necessary to give them responsibilities that would increase their skills in leadership positions. Structural changes, such as "family friendly" policies in the form of flexible faculty meeting time may also be helpful so that female faculty with children can participate effectively in the university.
Hannah Benedicta Taylor-Abdulai,
Lipsey Samuel Appiah-Kwapong,
Socio-Cultural Factors to Breaking through the Glass Ceiling: A Case Study of University of Ghana, Legon, Social Sciences.
Vol. 3, No. 5,
2014, pp. 170-176.
Bradley, D. (1993). A foot in the door: women in employment, education and training in Australia, Unicorn, 19(1):15-27
Sutherland, M. (1985), Women Who Teach in Universities, Trentham, London.
Prah M. (2002) “Gender Issues in Ghanaian Tertiary Institutions.” In Ghana Studies 5, Pages 83, 122
de la Rey. (1998) South African Women in Higher Education.A Review of their Experiences. Penguin Fastprint. Pgs.5-20
Forster N. (2001). A case study of women academics' views on equal opportunities, career prospects and work-family conflicts in a UK University Career Development International 28 - 38
Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift. New York: Viking.
Headlee, S.(1996), the cost of being female. Fraeger Publishers 88 Post Road West, West Post
Currie, J. et.al (2002), Gendered Universities in Globalized Economies: Powers, Careers and Sacrifices, Lexington Books, New York.
Davidson, M.J. & Cooper, C.L. (1987). Female managers in Britain: A comparative perspective. Human Management Resource, 26 pages 217-242.
Strober, M. (1982) "The MBA: Same Passport to Success for Women and Men." In Phyllis Wallace, (ed) Women in the Workplace. Boston, MA: Auburn House Publishing, p. 25-44.
Lambert, S. J. (1990).Processes linking work and family: A critical review and research agenda. Human Relations, 43 (3), 239-257.
Arber, S. and Ginn, J. (1995). The mirage of gender equality: occupational success in the labour market and within marriage. British Journal of Sociology, 46 (1), 21-43.
Cole, J. R., & Zuckerman, H. (1991). Marriage, motherhood, and research performance in science. In H. Zuckerman, J. R. Cole, &J. T. Bruer (Eds.), The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community (pp. 157-170). New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
Taylor, H. B. (2007). The nature of glass ceiling in Ghanaian Universities: A case study of University of Ghana, Legon. An unpublished M.Phil dissertation. University of Ghana, Legon. Pg 95 – 105
Taylor, H. B. (2003). The nature of glass ceiling in a service industry; a case study of S.I.C. An unpublished post graduate diploma dissertation. University of Ghana, Legon pages 20-29
Wirth L. (2001). Breaking through the Glass Ceiling: Women in management. Geneva, International Labour Office (pg.25-147)
Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift. New York: Viking.
Marshall, C. (1984). From culturally defined to self-defined: Career stages of women administrators. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 272 968)
Barinaga, M. (1992). Profile of a field: Neuroscience - the pipeline is leaking. Science. 255(13 March), 1366-1368.
Brush, E. G., Merrill-Sands, D., Gapasin, D. P., & Mabesa, V. L. (1995). Women Scientists and Managers in Amicuhural Research in the PhiIinnines (ISNAR Research Report No. 7). The Hague: International Service for Agricultural Research.
Fox, M. F. (1991). Gender, environmental milieu, and productivity in science. In Zuckerman, H. Cole, J. R. &. Bruer J. T (Eds.). The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community (Pg. 171- 204). New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
Ferreira, V. (1997) Affirmative action and employment segregation in Portugal. Paper presented at the 3rd European Feminist Research Conference, Coimbra.
Guy, M. E. (1995). Women, public administration, and the personnel function. In S. Hays & R. C. Kearney (Eds.), Public personnel administration: Problems and prospects, 3rd ed. (pg. 232-246). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Newman, M.A. (1993). Career advancement: Does gender make a difference? Federal civil service. Public Administration Review, 54(6), 507-514
Primack, R. B., & O’Leary, V. (1993). Cumulative disadvantages in the careers of women ecologists. Bioscience. 43(March 3), 158-l 65.
Sonnert, G. (1995). What makes a good scientists? Determinants of peer evaluation among biologists.Social Studies of Science. 25, 35-55.