Please enter verification code
Authenticity and Its Adaptive and Maladaptive Relations
Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
Volume 8, Issue 2, April 2019, Pages: 33-37
Received: Mar. 15, 2019; Accepted: Apr. 26, 2019; Published: May 15, 2019
Views 664      Downloads 88
Djurdja Grijak, Technical Faculty, Mihajlo Pupin, University of Novi Sad, Zrenjanin, Serbia
Article Tools
Follow on us
The aim of the research was to evaluate the factors of authenticity (Self-alienation, Accepting external influence and Authentic living) in their nomological network including positive and negative affect, self-esteem, psychological distress and psychological wellbeing. The sample were 206 students (93.2% females) from the University in Novi Sad. Instruments used were Authenticity Scale, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale - RSE, The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - PANAS and Mental Health Inventory – 38 - MHI-38. Results implied that Authentic living has adaptive relations with self-esteem and positive affectivity, while Self-alienation and Accepting external influences has adaptive relations with psychological distress. Maladaptive relations has Self-alienation with self-esteem, positive affectivity and psychological well-being (overall positive affectivity, emotional relations and satisfaction with life) and Accepting external influences has with positive affectivity. This study is significant for further illumination of the role of authenticity in mental health.
Authenticity, Maladaptive, Adaptive, Mental Health, Self-Esteem
To cite this article
Djurdja Grijak, Authenticity and Its Adaptive and Maladaptive Relations, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 8, No. 2, 2019, pp. 33-37. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20190802.11
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Grijak, Đ. (2017b). Authenticity as a predictor of mental health. Klinička psihologija, 10, 1-2, 23-34.
Klipfel, K. M. (2015). Authenticity and Learning: Implications for Reference Librarianship and Information Literacy Instruction. College & Research Libraries, 76, 1, 19-30.
Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. London: Constable.
Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Baliousis, M., Joseph, S. (2008). The authentic personality: A theoretical and empirical conceptualization and the development of the Authenticity Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology 55(3), 385-399.
Barrett-Lennard, G. T. (1998). Carl Rogers’ helping system: Journey and substance. London: Sage.
Shamsi, A., Ghamarani, A., Samadi, M., Ahmadzadeh M. (2012). The Study Of The Validity And Reliability Of The Authentic Personality Scale. Journal Of Psychological Models And Methods, 2, 8, 87-99.
İlhan, T., Özdemir, Y (2013). Adaptation of Authenticity Scale to Turkish: A validity and Reliability Study. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 5(40), 142-153.
Grégoire, S., Baron, L., Ménard, J., Lachance, L. (2014). The Authenticity Scale: Psychometric Properties of a French Translation and Exploration of Its Relationships with Personality and Well-Being. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 46(3), 346-355.
Grijak, Đ. (2017a). Psychometric evaluation of the Authenticity Scale on the sample of students in Serbia. Psihologija, 50(1), 85-99.
Neff, K. D., & Suizzo, M. A. (2006). Culture, power, authenticity and psychological well-being within romantic relationships: A comparison of European American and Mexican Americans. Cognitive Development, 21, 441–457.
Neff, K. D., & Harter, S. (2002). The authenticity of conflict resolutions among adult couples: Does women’s other-oriented behavior reflect their true selves? Sex Roles, 47, 403–417.
Lopez, F. G., Rice, K. G. (2006). Preliminary development and validation of a measure of relationship authenticity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 362–371.
Sheldon, K. M. (2004). Integrity (honesty/authenticity). In C. Peterson & M. E. P. Seligman (Eds.), Character strengths and virtues. New York: Oxford University Press.
Satıcı, S. A., Kayış, R., & Akın, A. (2013). Predictive role of authenticity on psychological vulnerability in Turkish university students. Psychological Reports: Mental & Physical Health, 112(2), 519-528
Lakey, C. E., Kernis, M. H., Heppner, W., L., & Lance, C. E. (2008). Individual differences in authenticity and mindfulness as predictors of verbal defensiveness. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 230-238.
Robinson, O. C., Lopez, F., Ramos, K. & Nartova-Bochaver, S. (2013). Authenticity, social context and wellbeing in the USA, England, and Russia: A three country comparative analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 719–737.
Joseph, S., Linley, P. A. (2005). Positive adjustment to threatening events: An organismic valuing theory of growth through adversity. Review of General Psychology, 9, 262–280.
Sariçam, H. (2015). Life Satisfaction: Testing a Structural Equation Model Based on Authenticity and Subjective Happiness. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 46(2), 278-284. DOI - 10.1515/ppb-2015-0034
Pinto, D. G., Maltby, J., Wood, A. M., & Day, L. ( 2012 ) A behavioral test of Horney's linkage between authenticity and aggression: people living authentically are lesslikely to respond aggressively in unfair situations. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 41-44.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegan, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.
Veit, C., Ware, J. (1983). The structure of psychological distress and wellbeing in general populations. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 730-742.
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (001)347-983-5186