Language Ethics: Linguo Psychology and Psycholinguistics (Analysis of the Language with Psychological Problems)
Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
Volume 6, Issue 2, April 2017, Pages: 16-20
Received: Mar. 5, 2017;
Accepted: Mar. 23, 2017;
Published: Apr. 11, 2017
Views 2756 Downloads 158
Valida Karimova, Division of Graduate Studies and Research, Khazar University, Baku, Azerbaijan
The objective purpose of this research is to give brief and essential information about the school and directions of psycholinguistics, to investigate what psycholinguistics examine and define the search for an understanding of how humans develop, perceive and produce a language. Psycholinguistics is adjoining of psychology and linguistics. Being the research object of psycholinguistics speech is not only biological, but also a psychological factor and which characterized the person. Psycholinguistics explores the mental mechanisms of basic language processing (cognitive); how to comprehend words and intend them in the mind, how to understand a sentence, how to learn to read, how language and writing systems influence mental organizations. Language and comprehension perform the same functions. Language is a body which forms the idea. It is a great and complex system which maintains its value and deserves respect. Language is only the way with which learners make sense of the world expressed in a different language. Article gives an essential study which combines the fields of linguistics and psychology. Directly cover speech and language pathology, language psychology, language learning, language behavior or cognitive sciences.
Language Ethics: Linguo Psychology and Psycholinguistics (Analysis of the Language with Psychological Problems), Psychology and Behavioral Sciences.
Vol. 6, No. 2,
2017, pp. 16-20.
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Askerov. M. B. The Psycholinguistic Essence of Language. “Researchs”. ANAS Institute of Linguistics. Baku, “Science”, 2004, № 2, pp. 60-64.
Askerov. M. B. Mutual Reflections in Language and Perceive. “Scientific Researchs”, ANAS, XXV edition, Baku, “Echo”, 2006, pp. 111-115.
Askerov. M. B. Theory of Linguo psychology Unity. Baku, 2005. (Əsgərov. M. B. Linqvo-psixoloji Vəhdət Nəzəriyyəsi. Bakı, 2005)
Chesnokov. P. V. Basic Units of Language and Thinking. Rostov. 1966, pp. 91.
Chomsky. N. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. M., 1972, pp. 13.
Chomsky. N. Syntactic Structures. New in Linguistics, M., 1962. 2nd edition.
Davies. A and Elder. C, Claire Kramsch. 2008 – Language, Thought and Culture and the problem of Linguistic Relativity. Chapter 9, part 9.2.1. pp236.
Gurbanov. A. General Linguistics. Baku, Education. 1989, pp. 54.
Humboldt. V. Selected Works on Linguistics, M., 1984, pp. 69-70.
Humboldt. V. O. On the difference between the organisms of a human language and the influence of this difference on the mental development of the human race. 1859, pp. 47.
I. Herder. 1772. 1960, pp. 99-100.
Pazukhin. R. V. K. Bühler's theory of the functions of language as an attempt at a psychological solution of linguistic problems. №2, М. 1963, pp. 90-110.
Psycholinguistics. A Survey of Theory and Research Problems. Ed. By Ch. E. Osgood and T. A. Sebeok. Baltimore, 1954.
Veysalli. F. Y. Introduction to Linguistics. Baku, 2013.
Veysalli. F. Y. Introduction to Germanic Linguistics. Baku, 2011.
Veysalli. F. Y. Language. Baku, 2007.
Veysalli. F. Y. Basics of Structural Linguistics. Baku, 2008.
Vygotsky. L. S. Psychology. April Publishing, “Eksmo Press”, Moscow, 2000, pp. 267.
Vygotsky. L. S. Psychology. April Publishing, “Eksmo Press”, Moscow, 2000, pp. 840-842.
Vygotsky. L. S. Instrumental Method in Psychology. Moscow, 1960, pp. 227.
Wurm, L. H., & Ross, S. E. Conditional root uniqueness points: Psychological validity and perceptual consequences. 2001.
Zorzi, M. Serial processing in reading aloud: No challenge for a parallel model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 2000, pp. 847-856.
Zwitserlood, P., Boelte, J., & Dohmes, P. Morphological effects on speech production: Evidence from picture naming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 2000, pp. 563-591.