Please enter verification code
Confirm
Haptic Perception of Parallelity
Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
Volume 3, Issue 6, December 2014, Pages: 212-221
Received: Nov. 17, 2014; Accepted: Nov. 27, 2014; Published: Dec. 16, 2014
Views 3204      Downloads 187
Author
Hanneke Ida van Mier, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Research has shown that the haptic perception of orientation is susceptible to systematic spatial bias. Large and systematic deviations have been found in haptic parallelity matching tasks supporting a reference frame based model. It has been suggested that the observed deviations result from the use of a frame of reference that is intermediate to an allocentric and an egocentric reference frame. The systemic bias of the deviations seems be caused by the strong bias produced by the hand-centered egocentric reference frame. In this paper results of studies are discussed showing a strong evidence for the abovementioned model in which egocentric representations exist in parallel to allocentric ones, and in which the former is biased by a hand-centered reference frame. The extent to which each representation is used appears to depend on factors like orientation, distance, gender, task instruction, practice and training. Manipulations stimulating allocentric processing or reducing egocentric processing have been shown to affect haptic parallelity performance.
Keywords
Haptic Perception, Egocentric, Allocentric, Reference Frame, Gender, Delay, Vision
To cite this article
Hanneke Ida van Mier, Haptic Perception of Parallelity, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 3, No. 6, 2014, pp. 212-221. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20140306.16
References
[1]
Appelle, S. (1972). Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the “oblique effect” in man and animals. Psychological Bulletin, 78, 266-278.
[2]
Appelle, S., & Countryman, M. (1986). Eliminating the haptic oblique effect: Influence of scanning incongruity and prior knowledge of the standards. Perception, 15, 325-329.
[3]
Blumenfeld, W. (1937). The relationship between the optical and haptic construction of space. Acta Psychologica, 2, 125-174.
[4]
Brambring, M. (1976). The structure of haptic space in the blind and sighted. Psychological Research, 38, 283-302.
[5]
Coleman, A., & Durgin, F. H. (2014). Egocentric reference frame bias in the palmar haptic perception of surface orientation. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 21, 955-960.
[6]
Cuijpers, R. H., Kappers, A. M., & Koenderink, J. J. (2000). Large systematic deviations in visual parallelism. Perception, 29, 1467-1482.
[7]
Dounskaia, N., Goble, J. A., & Wang, W. (2011). The role of intrinsic factors in control of arm movement direction: implications from directional preferences. Journal of Neurophysiology, 105, 999-1010.
[8]
Fernández-Díaz, M., & Travieso, D. (2011). Performance in haptic geometrical matching tasks depends on movement and position of the arm. Acta Psychologica, 136, 382-389.
[9]
Flanders. M., & Soechting, J. F (1995). Frames of reference for hand orientation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 182-195.
[10]
Gentaz, E., & Hatwell, Y. (1995). The haptic ‘oblique effect’ in children’s and adults’ perception of orientation. Perception, 24, 631-646.
[11]
Henriques, D. Y., & Soechting, J. F. (2003). Bias and sensitivity in the haptic perception of geometry. Experimental Brain Research, 150, 95-108.
[12]
Henriques, D. Y., Flanders, M., & Soechting, J. F. (2004). Haptic synthesis of shapes and sequences. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91, 1808-1821.
[13]
Henriques, D. Y., Flanders, M., & Soechting, J. F. (2005). Distortions in the visual perception of shape. Experimental Brain Research, 160, 384-393.
[14]
Hermens, F., & Gielen, S. C. A. M. (2003). Visual and haptic matching of perceived orientations of lines. Perception, 32, 235-248.
[15]
Hermens, F., Kappers, A. M. L., & Gielen, S. C. A. M. (2006). The structure of frontoparallel haptic space is task dependent. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 62-75.
[16]
Kaas, A. L., & Van Mier, H. I. (2006). Haptic spatial matching in near peripersonal space. Experimental Brain Research, 170, 403-413.
[17]
Kaas, A. L., Van Mier, H. I., & Goebel, R. (2007a). The neural correlates of human working memory for haptically explored object orientations. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 1637-1649.
[18]
Kaas, A. L., Van Mier, H. I., Lataster, J., Fingal, M., & Sack, A. T. (2007b). The effect of visuo-haptic congruency on haptic spatial matching. Experimental Brain Research, 183, 75-85.
[19]
Kappers, A. M. L. (1999). Large systematic deviations in the haptic perception of parallelity. Perception, 28, 1001-1012.
[20]
Kappers, A. M. L. (2002). Haptic perception of parallelity in the midsagittal plane. Acta Psychologica, 109, 25-40.
[21]
Kappers, A. M. L. (2003). Large systematic deviations in a bimanual parallelity task: further analysis of contributing factors. Acta Psychologica, 114, 131-145.
[22]
Kappers, A. M. L. (2004). The contributions of egocentric and allocentric reference frames in haptic spatial tasks. Acta Psychologica, 117, 333-340.
[23]
Kappers, A. M. L. (2007). Haptic space processing – allocentric and egocentric reference frames. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 208-218.
[24]
Kappers, A. M. L., & Koenderink, J. J. (1999). Haptic perception of spatial relations. Perception, 28, 781-795.
[25]
Kappers, A. M. L., & Liefers, B. J. (2012). What Feels Parallel Strongly Depends on Hand Orientation. In P. Isokosi, & J. Springare (Eds.), Haptics: Perception, Devices, Mobility, and Communication, volume 7282 of Lecture Notes on Computer Science, (pp. 239-246). Berlin: Springer.
[26]
Kappers, A. M. L., Postma, A., & Viergever, R. F. (2008). How robust are the deviations in haptic parallelity? Acta Psychologica, 128, 15-24.
[27]
Kappers, A. M. L., & Schakel, W. B. (2011). Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task. Experimental Brain Research, 208, 467-473.
[28]
Kappers, A. M. L., & Viergever, R.F. (2006). Hand orientation is insufficiently compensated for in haptic spatial perception. Experimental Brain Research, 173, 407-414.
[29]
Kennett, S., Taylor - Clarke, M., & Haggard, P. (2001). Noninformative vision improves the spatial resolution of touch in humans. Current Biology, 11, 1188-1191.
[30]
Klatzky, R. L. (1998). Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations: Definitions, distinctions, and interconnections. In C. Freksa, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary approach to representing and processing spatial knowledge, (pp. 1–17). Berlin: Springer.
[31]
Lanca, M. & Bryant, D. J. (1995). Effect of orientation in haptic reproduction of line length. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 80, 1291-1298.
[32]
Lawson, R., Boylan, A., & Edwards, L. (2014). Where you look can influence haptic object recognition. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 76, 559-574.
[33]
Lechelt, E. C., Eliuk, J., & Tanne, G. (1976). Perceptual orientational asymmetries: A comparison of visual and haptic space. Perception & Psychophysics, 20, 463-469.
[34]
Lechelt, E. C., & Verenka, A. (1980). Spatial anisotropy in intramodal and cross modal judgements of stimulus orientations: the stability of the oblique effect. Perception, 9, 581- 589.
[35]
Lederman, S. J., Klatzky, R. L., & Barber, P. O. (1985). Spatial and movement-based heuristics for encoding pattern information through touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 33-49.
[36]
Luyat, M., Gentaz, E., Corte, T.R., & Guerraz, M. (2001). Reference frames and haptic perception of orientation: body and head tilt effects on the oblique effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 541-554.
[37]
Luyat, M., Moroni, C., & Gentaz, E. (2005). The role of contextual cues in the haptic perception of orientations and the oblique effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 760-766.
[38]
Marks, L. E., & Armstrong, L. (1996). Haptic and visual representations of space. In T. Inui, & J.T. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and Performance XVI: Information Integration in Perception and Communication, (pp. 263-287). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[39]
Millar, S., & Al-Attar, Z. (2004). External and body-centered frames of reference in spatial memory: evidence from touch. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 51-59.
[40]
Newport, R., Rabb, B., & Jackson, S.R. (2002). Noninformative vision improves haptic spatial perception. Current Biology, 12, 1661-1664.
[41]
Postma, A., Zuidhoek, S., Noordzij, M. L., & Kappers, A. M. L. (2008). Haptic orientation perception benefits from visual experience: evidence from early blind, late blind and sighted people. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1197-1206.
[42]
Ruggiero, G., Ruotolo, F., & Iachini, T. (2012). Egocentric/ allocentric and coordinate/categorical haptic encoding in blind people. Cognitive Processing, 13, S313-317.
[43]
Soechting, J. F., & Flanders, M. (1992). Moving in three-dimensional space: Frames of reference, vectors, and coordinate systems. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 15, 167-191.
[44]
Van Dijk, R., Kappers, A. M. L., & Postma, A. (2013). Superior spatial touch: Improved haptic orientation processing in deaf individuals. Experimental Brain Research, 230, 283-289.
[45]
Van Mier, H. I. (2013). Effects of visual information regarding allocentric processing in haptic parallelity matching. Acta Psychologica, 144, 352-360.
[46]
Volcic, R., & Kappers, A. M. L. (2008). Allocentric and egocentric reference frames in the processing of three-dimensional haptic space. Experimental Brain Research, 188, 199-213.
[47]
Volcic, R., Kappers, A. M. L., & Koenderink, J. J. (2007). Haptic parallelity perception on the frontoparallel plane: The involvement of reference frames. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 276-286.
[48]
Volcic, R., Van Rheede, J. J., Postma, A., & Kappers, A. M. L. (2008). Differential effects of non-informative vision and visual interference on haptic spatial processing. Experimental Brain Research, 190, 31-41.
[49]
Volcic, R., Wijntjes, M. W., & Kappers, A. M. L. (2009). Haptic mental rotation revisited: multiple reference frame dependence. Acta Psychologica, 130, 251-259.
[50]
Von Skramlik, E. (1937), Psychophysiologie der Tastsinne. Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.
[51]
Zuidhoek, S., Kappers, A. M. L., Noordzij, M. L., Van der Lubbe, R. H., & Postma, A. (2004a). Frames of reference in a haptic parallelity task: Temporal dynamics and the possible role of vision. In S. Ballesteros, & M. A. Heller (Eds.), Touch, blindness and neuroscience, (pp. 155-164). Madrid, Spain: UNED Press.
[52]
Zuidhoek, S., Kappers, A. M. L., & Postma, A. (2005). Effects of hand orientation and delay on the verbal judgement of haptically perceived orientation. Perception,34, 741-755.
[53]
Zuidhoek, S., Kappers, A. M. L., & Postma, A. (2007). Haptic orientation perception: Sex differences and lateralization of functions. Neuropsychologica, 45, 332-341.
[54]
Zuidhoek, S., Kappers, A. M. L., Van der Lubbe, R. H. J., & Postma, A. (2003). Delay improves performance on a haptic spatial matching task. Experimental Brain Research, 149, 320-330.
[55]
Zuidhoek, S., Visser, A., Bredero, M. E., & Postma, A. (2004b). Multisensory integration mechanisms in haptic space perception. Experimental Brain Research, 157, 265-268.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186