Student’s View of Education as the Merit and Private Economic Goods
Science Journal of Education
Volume 2, Issue 5, October 2014, Pages: 141-145
Received: Sep. 4, 2014; Accepted: Sep. 15, 2014; Published: Sep. 30, 2014
Views 2501      Downloads 150
Author
Vera Anatol’evna Gnevasheva, Institute for the Fundamental and Applied Researchers, Moscow University for the Humanities, Moscow, Russia
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Economic theory defines the market of the higher professional education as an intellectual property due to a system where product demand is formed by the higher education institutes. It is presently formed as the combined system of the state and non-state or private forms. The emergence of fee-based forms of education involves the formation of market relations and the determination of the price of such services. The higher professional education market arose in Russia together with the reform of other spheres of economic life in order to create out education, and also as the merit and the private economic goods. But the social importance of the role of these goods cannot identify education as the pure product of the market. The possibility of establishing education as the market product is formed in connection with the inseparability of the existing system of educational services from the labor market as the end user.
Keywords
Higher Professional Education, Market of the Goods, Merit and Private Economic Good, Labour Force, Youth
To cite this article
Vera Anatol’evna Gnevasheva, Student’s View of Education as the Merit and Private Economic Goods, Science Journal of Education. Vol. 2, No. 5, 2014, pp. 141-145. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20140205.11
References
[1]
Vera Gnevasheva “The Role of Education in the Development of Russian Society”, Russian Education and Society. Vol. 53, no 4, 2011, pp. 84-96.
[2]
Peter Drucker “The Educational Revolution”, (Eds.), Social Change: Sources, Patterns, and Consequences. N.Y., 1973.
[3]
Lynn Meek “Diversity and Marketization of Higher Education: Incompatible Concepts?”, Higher Education Policy, 2000.
[4]
Oleg Drobnitskii Mir ozhivshikh predmetov: Problema tsennosti i marksistskaia filosofiia. Moskva, Politizdat. 1967.
[5]
Oleg Drobnitskii Tsennost'. In: Filosofskaia entsiklopediia. Moskva, Sovetskaia Entsiklopediia. Vol. 5. 1970.
[6]
William Thomas and Florian Znaniecki The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. Vol. I. Boston, Richard Badger. 1918.
[7]
Gumanitarnoe znanie: tendentsii razvitiia v XXI veke Pod obshch. red. Valerya Lukova. Moskva, Izd-vo Natsional'nogo instituta biznesa. 2006.
[8]
Antonina Kovaleva, “Sotsializatsiia. In: Sotsiologicheskaia entsiklopediia”, 2 Vols, Moskva, Mysl', 2003, pp. 445.
[9]
Valeryi Lukov, Vladimir Lukov, ”Tezaurusnyi podkhod v gumanitarnykh naukakh”, Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. Vol. 1, 2004, pp. 93–100.
[10]
Vera Gnevasheva, “Sotsial'nye i kul'turnye tsennostnye ori-entatsii rossijskoj molodezhi”, M, MosGU, 2010, 303 p.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186