An Empirical Analysis of Students’ Learning and Achievements: A Motivational Approach
The present study details a theoretical-conceptual model, scoping the interrelations between antecedents (academic buoyancy, emotional and physiological states, task value), cognitive processes (habitual action, critical reflection), and adaptive outcomes (academic engagement, academic achievement) in the context of educational psychology. 294 (151 men, 143 women) first-year university students participated in this study. Likert-scale inventories were administered to students and used to elicit relevant data; for example, we used the Academic Buoyancy Scale [1, 2], and the Task value subscale of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Academic achievement was collated from students’ overall marks in the unit educational psychology. Structural equation modeling (SEM) analyses supported, in part, the conceptual model with some statistical significant paths. In general, on the basis of the findings yielded, there are significant implications for research development and educational practices.
Huy P. Phan,
Bing H. Ngu,
An Empirical Analysis of Students’ Learning and Achievements: A Motivational Approach, Education Journal.
Vol. 3, No. 4,
2014, pp. 203-216.
Martin, A.J. and H.W. Marsh, Academic buoyancy: Towards an understanding of students' every-day academic resilience. Journal of School Psychology, 2008. 46(1): p. 53-83.
Martin, A.J. and H.W. Marsh, Workplace and academic buoyancy: Psychometric assessment and construct validity amongst school personnel and students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2008. 26(2): p. 168 - 184.
Pintrich, P.R., et al., A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). 1991, Ann Arbor, MI: National Centre for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
Fenollar, P., S. Román, and P.J. Cuestas, University students' academic performance: An integrative conceptual framework and empirical analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2007. 77(Pt 4): p. 873-891.
Lau, S., A.D. Liem, and Y. Nie, Task - and self-related pathways to deep learning: The mediating role of achievement goals, classroom attentiveness, and group participation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2008. 78(4): p. 639-662.
Martin, A.J., et al., Longitudinal modelling of academic buoyancy and motivation: Do the 5Cs hold up over time? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2010. 80(3): p. 473-496.
Phan, H.P., Students' academic performance and various cognitive processes of learning: An integrative framework and empirical analysis. Educational Psychology, 2010. 30(3): p. 297-322.
Diseth, Å., Self-efficacy, goal orientations and learning strategies as mediators between preceding and subsequent academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 2011. 21(2): p. 191-195.
Author, Title: I (Interplay between.....). 2013.
Liem, A.D., S. Lau, and Y. Nie, The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2008. 33(4): p. 486-512.
Eccles, J.S., et al., Expectancies, values and academic behaviors, in Achievement and achievement motives, J.T. Spence, Editor. 1983, W. H. Freemen: San Francisco. p. 75-146.
Simons, J., S. Dewitte, and W. Lens, The role of different types of instrumentality in motivation, study strategies, and performance: Know why you learn, so you'll know what you learn! British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2004. 74(Pt 3): p. 343-360.
Leung, D.Y.P. and D. Kember, The relationship between approaches to learning and reflection upon practice. Educational Psychology, 2003. 23(1): p. 61-71.
Martin, A.J. and H.W. Marsh, Academic resilience and academic buoyancy: Multidimensional and hierarchical conceptual framing of causes, correlates and cognate constructs. Oxford Review of Education, 2009. 35(3): p. 353 - 370.
Martin, A.J. and H.W. Marsh, Academic resilience and its psychological and educational correlates: A construct validity approach. Psychology in the Schools, 2006. 43(3): p. 267-281.
Wigfield, A. and J.S. Eccles, Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2000. 25(1): p. 68-81.
Hulleman, C.S., et al., Task values, achievement goals, and interest: An integrative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2008. 100(2): p. 398-416.
Harackiewicz, J.M., et al., The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2008. 100: p. 105 - 122.
Meece, J.L., A. Wigfield, and J.S. Eccles, Predictors of math anxiety and its influence on young adolescents' course enrollment intentions and performance in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1990. 82: p. 60 - 70.
Updegraff, K.A., et al., Course enrollment as self-regulatory behavior: Who takes optimal high school math courses? Learning and Individual Differences, 1996. 8: p. 239 - 259.
Greene, B.A., et al., Predicting high school students' cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2004. 29: p. 462 - 482.
Cole, J.S., D.A. Bergin, and T.A. Whittaker, Predicting student achievement for low stakes tests with effort and task value. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2008. 33: p. 609-624.
Pintrich, P.R., et al., Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Mea-surement, 1993. 53: p. 810-814.
Bandura, A., Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. 1986, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A., Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. 1997, New York: W. H. Freeman & Co.
Pajares, F. and J. Kranzler, Self-efficacy beliefs and general mental ability in mathematical problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1995. 20: p. 426-443.
Pajares, F. and M.J. Johnson, Self-efficacy beliefs and the writing performance of entering high school students. Psychology in the Schools, 1996. 33: p. 163-175.
Kember, D., et al., Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflective thinking. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2000. 25(4): p. 381-389.
Dewey, J., How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. 1933, Boston: D. C Health (Original work published in 1909).
Schön, D., The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. 1983, New York: Basic Books.
Schön, D., Educating the reflective practitioner. 1987, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Phan, H.P., An examination of reflective thinking, learning approaches, and self-efficacy beliefs at the University of the South Pacific: A path analysis. Educational Psychology, 2007. 27(6): p. 789-806.
Phan, H.P., Exploring students’ reflective thinking practice, deep processing strategies, effort, and achievement goal orientations. Educational Psychology, 2009. 29(3): p. 297-313.
Pike, G.R. and G.D. Kuh, First - and second-generation college students: A comparison of their engagement and intellectual devel-opment. The Journal of Higher Education, 2005. 76(3): p. 276 - 300.
Carini, R.M., G.D. Kuh, and S.P. Klein, Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 2006. 47(1): p. 1 - 32.
Lester, J., J.B. Leonard, and D. Mathias, Transfer student engagement: Blurring of social and academic engagement. Community College Review, 2013. 41(3): p. 202 - 222.
Salamonson, Y., S. Andrew, and B. Everett, Academic engagement and disengagement as predictors of performance in pathphysiology among nursing students. Contemporary Nurse, 2009. 32(1 - 2): p. 123 - 132.
Suárez-Orozco, C., A. Pimentel, and M. Martin, The significance of relationships: Academic engagement and achievement among newcomer immigrant youth. Teachers College Record, 2009. 111(3): p. 712 - 749.
Axelson, R.D. and A. Flick, Defining student engagement. Change: The Magazine of Higher Education, 2010. 43(1): p. 38 - 43.
Steinberg, S., B.B. Brown, and S.M. Dornbusch, Beyond the classroom. 1996, New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Greenwood, C.R., B.T. Horton, and C.A. Utley, Academic engagement: Current perspectives in research and practice. School Psychology Review, 2002. 31(3): p. 1 - 31.
Marks, H.M., Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, miiddle, and high school years. America Educational Research Journal, 2000. 37: p. 153 - 184.
Fredricks, J.A., P.C. Blumenfeld, and A.H. Paris, School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 2004. 74(1): p. 59-109.
Pace, C.R., Measuring the quality of student effort. Current Issues in Higher Education, 1980. 2: p. 10 - 16.
Austin, A.W., Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 1984. 25(4): p. 297 - 308.
Tinto, V., Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. 1987, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tinto, V., Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. 2nd ed. 1993, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chickering, A.W. and Z.F. Gamson, Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 1987. March: p. 3 - 7.
Kuh, G.D. and Others, Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. 2005, San Francisco: Jos-sey-Bass.
Kuh, G.D., et al., Involving colleges: Successful approaches to fostering student learning and personal development outisde the classroom. 1991, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kuh, G.D., The National Surveys of Student Engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009. 141: p. 5 - 20.
Kuh, G.D., Assessing what really matters to student learning: Inside the National Survey of Student Engagement. Change, 2001. 33(3): p. 10 - 17, 66.
Kuh, G.D., What we're learning about student engagement from NSSE. Change, 2003. 35(2): p. 24 - 32.
Kuh, G.D., The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties, in Framework and Psychometric Properties. 2003, Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning. p. 1 - 26.
Schaufeli, W.B., et al., The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2002. 3: p. 71 - 92.
Pajares, F. and G. Valiante, Influence of self-efficacy on elementary students' writing. The Journal of Educational Research, 1997. 90: p. 353-360.
Pajares, F., Self-Efficacy beliefs and mathematical problem-solving of gifted students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1996. 21: p. 325-344.
Pajares, F., M.D. Miller, and M.J. Johnson, Gender differences in writing self-efficacy beliefs of elementary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1999. 91(1): p. 50-61.
Martin, A.J. and H. Marsh, Motivating boys and motivating girls: Does teacher gender really make a difference? Australian Journal of Education, 2005. 49(3): p. 320 - 334.
Martin, A.J., The Student Motivation Scale: A tool for measuring and enhancing motivation. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 2001. 11: p. 1 - 20.
Author, Title B: (An integrated.....). 2014.
Lent, R.W., F.G. Lopez, and K.J. Bieschke, Mathematics self-efficacy: Sources and relation to science-based career choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1991. 38(4): p. 424-430.
Matsui, T., K. Matsui, and R. Ohnishi, Mechanisms underlying math self-efficacy learning of college students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1990. 37: p. 225-238.
Byrne, B.M., Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. 2nd ed. 2010, New York, NY: Routledge.
Kline, R.B., Principles and practice of structural equation modeling 3rd ed. 2011, New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Loehlin, J.C., Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural equation analysis. 4th ed. 2004, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Schumacker, R.E. and R.G. Lomax, A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. 2nd ed. 2004, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Chou, C.P. and P.M. Bentler, Estimates and tests in structural equation modelling, in Structural equation modelling: Concepts, issues, and applications, R.H. Hoyle, Editor. 1995, Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA. p. 37-55.
Byrne, B.M., Structural equation modelling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS. 1998, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Willms, J.D., Student engagement at school: A sense of belonging and participation. Results from PISA 2000. 2003, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
Osterman, K.F., Students' need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 2000. 70: p. 323 - 367.
Ma, X., Sense of belonging to school: Can schools make a difference? Journal of Educational Research, 2003. 96(6): p. 1 - 9.
Henry, K.L., K.E. Knight, and T.P. Thornberry, School disengagement as a predictor of dropout, delinquency, and problem substance use during adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 2012. 41: p. 156 - 166.
Henry, K.L., Academic achievement and adolescent drug use: An examination of re-ciprocal effects and correlated growth trajectories. Journal of School Health, 2010. 80(1): p. 38 - 43.
Yeung, A.S., Student self-concept and effort: Gender and grade differences. Educa-tional Psychology, 2011. 31: p. 749 - 772.
Author, Title: B (Critical thinking as…..). 2010.
Yanchar, S.C., B.D. Slife, and R. Warne, Critical thinking as disciplinary practice. Re-view of General Psychology, 2008. 12(3): p. 265-281.
Becher, T., The disciplinary shaping of the professions, in The academic profession, B.R. Clarke, Editor. 1987, University of California Press: Berkley, CA. p. 271 - 303.
Becher, T., Academic tribes and territories 1989, Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
Marsh, H.W. and A.S. Yeung, Causal effects of aca-demic self-concept on academic achievement: Structural equation models of longitudinal data. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1997. 89(1): p. 41-54.
Marsh, H.W. and A.S. Yeung, Longitudinal structural equation models of academic self-concept and achievement: Gender dif-ferences in the development of math and English constructs. American Educational Research Journal, 1998. 35(4): p. 705-738.
Phan, H.P., Cognitive processes in university learning: A developmental framework using structural equation modelling. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2011. 81(3): p. 509-530.
Bong, M., Role of self-efficacy and task-value in pre-dicting college students’ course performance and future enrollment intentions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2001. 26: p. 553-570.
Phan, H.P., Informational sources, self-efficacy, and achievement: A temporally displaced approach. Educational Psychology, 2012. 32(6): p. 699 - 726.
Durik, A.M., C.M. Lovejoy, and S.J. Johnson, A longitudinal study of achievement goals for college in general: Predicting cumulative GPA and diversity in course selec-tion. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2009. 34: p. 113-119.
Rogosa, D., Causal models in longitudinal research: Rationale, formulation, and interpretation, in Longitudinal re-search in the study of behaviour and development, J.R. Nesselroade and P.B. Balles, Editors. 1979, Academic Press: New York. p. 263-302.
Phan, H.P., Deep Processing Strategies and Critical Thinking: Developmental Trajectories Using Latent Growth Analyses. The Journal of Educational Research, 2011. 104(4): p. 283-294.
McArdle, J.J. and J.R. Nesselroade, Growth curve analysis in contemporary psychological research, in Handbook of psychology: Research methods in psychology, J.A. Schinka and W.F. Velicer, Editors. 2003, Wiley: New York. p. 447-480.
Bollen, K.A. and P.J. Curran, Latent curve models: A structural equation pers-pective. Wiley series in probability and statistics, ed. W.A. Shewhart and S.S. Wilks. 2006, Hobo-ken, NJ: Wiley.
Hancock, G.R. and F.R. Lawrence, Using latent growth models to evaluate longitudinal change, in Structural equation modeling: A second course, G.R. Hancock and R.O. Mueller, Editors. 2006, Information Age Publishing: Greenwich, Connecticut. p. 171-196.