Factors Affecting Term Scores of Taiwanese College Students
Education Journal
Volume 4, Issue 3, May 2015, Pages: 94-97
Received: Apr. 2, 2015; Accepted: Apr. 14, 2015; Published: Apr. 24, 2015
Views 3909      Downloads 148
Shan-Shan Kung, The Department of English Studies, Ming-Dao University, Zhanghua, Taiwan
Article Tools
Follow on us
Highly globalized society in modern society makes English extraordinarily important. Taiwan is evitable affected by this trend; especially many of its economic and educational activities are linked to the United States. To explore how student can improve their English skill that is of higher priority in future career succeed, this study adopts a multivariate regression analysis to evaluate important factors with potential significant influences. The result could be useful to teachers in class teaching by measuring the influences of crucial factors quantitatively and thus, teachers could focus on the factors affecting the most and strength the English ability of students. The data is randomly selected from the university record and the result shows that the data fits the model well. The statistical result indicates that gender, outside-reading, study hours and interest in watching English movies affect the average term English score significantly. However, effect from most of variables is only one time shock and cannot be accumulated; only the study hours is positively related to the average term score with the diminishing return to scale but accumulative effects, implying that the variable of study hour could be the most important factor affecting the average term English score of students. Therefore, based on the regression result, the best strategy of students trying to enhance term English score is to allocate their study hours reasonably while other methods such as reading English novels and soap opera should be used as supplementary.
Average term English Score, College Student, Multivariate Regression Analysis, Taiwan
To cite this article
Shan-Shan Kung, Factors Affecting Term Scores of Taiwanese College Students, Education Journal. Vol. 4, No. 3, 2015, pp. 94-97. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20150403.11
N. Modiano, “Linguistic imperialism, cultural integrity, and EIL,” ELT Journal, 2001, 55(4), 339-346
T.L. Harris and R. E. Hodges, (Eds.). The literacy dictionary: The vocabulary of reading and writing, 1995, Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
B. Street, Literacy in theory and practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
R. L. Venezky, D.A.Wagner, and B. S. Ciliberti, (Eds.), Toward defining literacy. Newark, DE: International Reading Association, 1990.
C, Nuttall, Teaching Reading Skills in a Foreign Language, London, Great Britain: Richard Clay Ltd, Bungay, Suffolk, 1982.
C. P. Casanave, “Comprehension Monitoring in ESL Reading: A Neglected Essential.” TESOL Quarterly, 1988, (22), 282-302.
J. Gee, “Learning language as a matter of learning social languages within discourses”, Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada, 1999.
N. Fairclough, Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman, 1995.
E. A. Hanushek, "The economics of schooling: production and efficiency in the public schools," Journal of Economic Literature, 1986, XXIV (3): 1141-78.
D. G. Dan and J. B. Dominic, “Evaluating the effect of teacher degree level on educational performance.” Reports-Evaluative/Feasibility (142), 1996.
D. H. Monk and J. King, “Multi-level teacher resource effects on pupil performance in secondary mathematics and science: the role of teacher subject matter preparation.” In R. G. Ehrenberg, ed., Choices and Consequences: Contemporary Policy Issues in Education, 1994, pp. 29–58. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
R. G. Ehrenberg .and D. J. Brewer, “Do school and teacher characteristics matter? Evidence from High School and Beyond”, Economics of Education Review, 1994, 13(1): 1-17.
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (001)347-983-5186