Comparison of Teacher Licensing between the United States of America and Malaysia: Implementation and Practical Implication
Education Journal
Volume 3, Issue 3, May 2014, Pages: 190-194
Received: Mar. 24, 2014; Accepted: May 13, 2014; Published: May 30, 2014
Views 3094      Downloads 248
Kahirol Mohd Salleh, Faculty of Technical and Vocational Education, University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia
Nor Lisa Sulaiman, Faculty of Technical and Vocational Education, University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia
Heidi Frederiksen, School of Education, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
Article Tools
Follow on us
The purpose of this paper is to address a conceptual challenge that arises to implement and the practical implication of teacher licensing. This paper will compare the practices of teacher licensing programs in Colorado, United States of America and similar teaching programs in Malaysia. It also addresses the challenge ahead to frame the teacher licensing application into the Malaysia education systems, particularly in teacher education programs. This challenge centers on articulating the teacher licensing program in Malaysia in terms of organization culture, teaching and learning practice, policy, and leadership. This paper is organized around three topics: (a) teacher licensing in Colorado, (b) challenges in adopting teacher licensing in Malaysia, and (c) discussion and recommendations.
Teacher Licensing, Schools, Educational Development, United States of America, Malaysia
To cite this article
Kahirol Mohd Salleh, Nor Lisa Sulaiman, Heidi Frederiksen, Comparison of Teacher Licensing between the United States of America and Malaysia: Implementation and Practical Implication, Education Journal. Vol. 3, No. 3, 2014, pp. 190-194. doi: 10.11648/
Albee, J. J., & Piveral, J. A. (2003). Management process for defining and monitoring teacher dispositions. The International Journal of Educational Management, 17(7), 346-356.
Ball, D. L. & McDiarmid, G. W. (1990).The subject-matter preparation of teachers. In W.R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 437–449). New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing.
Colorado State Board of Education. (n.d.). Colorado Licensing Division. Retrieved from Colorado Department of Education: Education&agencyID=109&agencyName=301 Colorado State Board of Education&ccrDocID=2044&ccrDocName=1 CCR 301-37 RULES FOR THE ADMINIS-TRATION OF THE EDUCAT&subDocID=56036&subDocName=2260.5-R-1.00
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013-1055.
Greenberg, J. & Walsh, K. (2012).What teacher preparation programs teach about K-12 assessment: A review. Washington, DC: National Council on Teacher Quality
Ingersoll, R. M. (2007). The preparation and qualifications of the teaching force in the United States. In Ingersoll, R. M. (Eds.), A comparative study of teacher preparation and qualifications in six nations (pp. 95-106). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education
Johari, J., Yahya, K. K., & Omar, A. (2011). The construct validity of organizational structure scale: evidence from Malaysia. World Journal of Management, 3(2), 131-152.
Lee, M. N. N. (2004). Malaysia teacher education into the new century. Reform of Teacher Education in the Asia-Pacific in the New Millennium, 3, 81-91. Doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-2722-26
Malaysian Government (2004).The development of education: National report of Malaysia. Retrieved from
Malaysian Government (2012). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Putrajaya, MY: Ministry of Education
No Child Left Behind. (2011, September 19). Retrieved from Education Week:
Mokshein, S. E., Ahmad, H., &Vongalis-Macrow, A. (2009).Secondary teacher policy research in Asia: Towards providing quality secondary education: Training and retraining quality teacher in Malaysia. Bangkok, Thailand: UNESCO
Morden, T. (1997). Leadership as vision. Management Decision, 35(9), 668-676.
PLACE. (2012). Program Overview. Retrieved from Program for Licensing Assessments for Colorado Educators:
Rashid, M. Z. A., Sambasivan, M., & Rahman, A. A. (2004).The influence of organizational culture on attitudes toward organizational change. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 25(2), 161-179.
Rao, R. R., & Jani, R. (2011).Teacher allocation and equity in Malaysian schools. International Journal of Institutions and Economies, 3(1), 103-112.
Salleh, K. M., & Sulaiman, N. L. (2012). Business process reengineering in Malaysia higher education institutions. International Journal of Business Management and Research 2(3), 1-7
Salleh, K. M., & Sulaiman, N. L. (2013). Malaysia leadership competencies: A model for effective performance. International Journal of Human Resource Management and Research, 3(2), 63-70
Sass, T. R. (2011). Certification requirements and teacher quality: A comparison of alternative routes to teaching. Retrieved from Certification_andTeacher_Quality_11.pdf
Sterman, J. (1994). Learning in and about Complex Systems. Systems Dynamics Review, pp. 291-330.
Teachers Test Prep, Inc. (2009-2012). Praxis. Retrieved from Teachers Test Prep:
Waks, L., & Sandelands, E. (2004). The US education system for the non-American faculty member: an interview with Leonard Waks. Education + Training, 46(1), 33-39.
World data on education (2011). United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Zaba, Z., Ramadan, F. I., Anning, I. N. A., Gunggut, H., & Umemato, K. (2011). Language-in-education policy: a study of policy adjustment strategy in Malaysia. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 2(5), 157-165.
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (001)347-983-5186