English Blog Writing---An Effective Way in College EFL Writing Teaching
Volume 3, Issue 2, March 2014, Pages: 111-115
Received: Feb. 28, 2014;
Published: Mar. 20, 2014
Views 2667 Downloads 199
Qin LI, College of Foreign Languages, China Three Gorges University, Hubei, China
Follow on us
English blog writing, a newly-applied communicative method based on the Internet provides a suitable and practical platform to remedy the traditional EFL (English as a Foreign Language) writing teaching. This paper tends to illustrate the importance and necessity of English blog writing by presenting the practical stages and reporting a case study with non-English majors in a Chinese university.
English Blog Writing, College English Writing Teaching, EFL Teaching and Learning
To cite this article
English Blog Writing---An Effective Way in College EFL Writing Teaching, Education Journal.
Vol. 3, No. 2,
2014, pp. 111-115.
Campbell, A. P. (2004）. Using Live Journal for Authentic Communication in EFL Classes. The Internet TESL Journal, 10(9), 64-68.
Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think. New York: D. C. Heath.
Duffy, T.M. & Jonassen, D. (eds.), (1992). Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Glasersfeld, E. (1989）. Cognition, Construction of Knowledge, and Teaching. Synthese, 80(1), 121-140.
Godwin-Jones, B. (2003). Blogs and Wikis: Environments for On-line Collaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7 (2).
Godwin-Jones.(2006）. Tag Clouds in the Blogosphere: Electronic Literacy and Social Networking . Language Learning & Technology ,10(2), 8-15. Available online: http://llt.msu.edu/vol10num2/emerging/default.html
Jones, M. G., & Brader-Araje, L. (2002). The impact of constructivism on education: Language, discourse, and meaning. American Communication Studies, 5, 1-10.
Stanley, G.. (2005). Blogging for ELT. Available online: http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/think/resources/blogging.shtml 2008-4-10.
Zhang, D. (2009). The Application of Blog in English Writing. Journal of Cambridge Studies, 4(1), 64-72.