The Collaborative Governance Mechanism and Enlightenment of Singapore Elderly Security System
International Journal of Business and Economics Research
Volume 7, Issue 4, August 2018, Pages: 88-96
Received: Jun. 14, 2018; Accepted: Jul. 11, 2018; Published: Aug. 6, 2018
Views 1168      Downloads 95
Yu Juyun, Department of Tax and Public Management, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang, China
Cai Yucen, Department of Tax and Public Management, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang, China
Ai Ting, Department of Tax and Public Management, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang, China
Article Tools
Follow on us
The CPF system held by government realize organic combination of housing and pension through purchase allowance and house-for-pension scheme, lifelong income for pension plans guarantees knock-down security. The CPF system has a certain function of redistribution. The government opposes generous welfare system and emphasizes the traditional family values and self-support; through the organic combination of law, principle and emotion, and the employment benefits, the family-support and self-support are unity. Enterprises have the inherent power to hire the elderly. Social organizations in the government’s support and control communicate the government and the people with propaganda publicity and providing support for the elderly. The key mechanism of the pension action for multiple unities is the authority government’s effective intervention. Its security is the government’s strong credibility and public participation mechanism, which is of significance to construct China’s old-age security system.
Singapore, Old Age Security System, Cooperative Governance Mechanism
To cite this article
Yu Juyun, Cai Yucen, Ai Ting, The Collaborative Governance Mechanism and Enlightenment of Singapore Elderly Security System, International Journal of Business and Economics Research. Vol. 7, No. 4, 2018, pp. 88-96. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20180704.12
Copyright © 2018 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Lee Kuan Yew. Memoirs of Lee Kuan Yew (1965-2000) [M]. Hong Kong: Federal Press (New) Pte Ltd, 2000.
Yap, M., Gee, C. Population Outcomes: Singapore 2050 [M]. Singapore: Institute of Policy Studies, 2014.
Jia Hongbo, Mu Huaizhong. Analysis on the Reform of Singapore's Central Provident Fund System [J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University (Social Science Edition), 2009, (4):92-95.
Hu Canwei. The Family Pension Model of Singapore and its Enlightenment [J]. Journal of Yunnan University of Nationalities, 2003, (3):35-38.
Zhou Suqin, Yang Zhizhen. A Brief Analysis of Singapore's Elderly Problem and the Government's Countermeasures [J]. Southeast Asia, 2002(11):44-47.
Liu Yulling. Singapore Observation: the Four-in-one Successful Aging Framework [J]. Special Zone Economy, 2014(5):134-135.
Jiang Xiaoping. Social Governance System Innovation in the Modernization of National Governance [J]. China Administration, 2014, (2):24-28.
Zhou Xiaoli, Dang Xiuyun. Social Governance in Western Countries: Mechanisms, Concepts and Implications [J]. Nanjing Social Science, 2013(10):75-81.
Robert, A. Managing Collaborative Public Performance [J]. Public and Management Review, 2005, 29.
Ansell, C., Alison Gash, A. Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice [J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2007,18.
Xu Guochong. Political Implications of “HDB”: Inspiration from Singapore's Housing Policy [J], China Administration, 2017(3):145-150.
Sun Jingfeng, Liu Jiabao. New Theory of "Singapore-style democracy" [J], Journal of social science in Jilin university, 2016(5):73-82.
Fan Ruolan. An Analysis on the Relationship between Women's Rights and Patriarchy in Singapore [J]. Southeast Asian Studies, 2016(1):4-10.
LI Jian: How can the government promote the development of social enterprises? --Experiences from Singapore [J], Economic restructuring, 2016(5):19-24.
He Xiaopei. Singapore Social Organization Survey [J]. Group Article in Heaven and Earth, 2011(16):263-264.
Xu Zhenghua, Hu Ganyong. Commentary on the Law on the Maintenance of Parents in Singapore and its Implications for China [J]. Jiangxi Social Science, 2012(9):151-155.
Chen Zuzhou. From Multiculturalism to Comprehensive Culture: on the Relationship between Confucian Culture and Singapore's Economic Modernization [J]. Journal of Nanjing University, 2004(6):134-141.
Lee Kuan Yew. Changes in Singapore - Premier Li Delivers a Speech to Nus and Nanyang Technological Students [N]. United Morning Post, 1988-8-30.
Wu Yuanhua. Good Governance in Singapore [M]. Beijing: China Social Science Press, 2012:161, 201, 176.
Goh Chok Tong, G. C. Moral Values: The Foundation of a Vibrant State [J]. National Day Rally Address, 21 August 1994,21(8).
Saw, S. H. The Population of Singapore (3rd edn)[M]. Singapore: Institute of South East Asian Studies, 2012.
Yu Juyun. A Comparative Study on "Maintenance of Parents Act" between China and Singapore-- Based on Multiple Coordinate Governance Mechanism [J]. Foreign Social Science, 2017.3:136-144.
Yu Wenxuan. The law is Capricious -- Singapore's Public Administration [M]. Shanghai Sanlian Bookstore,2015:6.
Yu Juyun. The Replacement Rate and Equity Evaluation of Endowment Insurance System before and after Merger [J]. Reform, 2015 (7):82-90.
Mukul, G. A., Nandy, A Singapore’s Policy Responses to Aging, Inequality and Poverty: An Assessment [J]. International Social Security Review, 2008.1
Irene, Y. H. Being Poor in a Rich ‘Nanny State’: Developments in Singapore Social Welfare [J]. The Singapore Economic Review, 2015, 3.
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (001)347-983-5186