International Journal of Business and Economics Research
Volume 6, Issue 6, December 2017, Pages: 145-152
Received: Nov. 23, 2017;
Accepted: Dec. 11, 2017;
Published: Jan. 10, 2018
Views 2535 Downloads 133
Sumiko Asai, School of Political Science and Economics, Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan
Although open access has steadily developed with the continuous increase in subscription journal price, the effect of open access articles on citations remains a controversial issue. The present study empirically examines the factors determining authors' choice to provide open access and the effects of open access on downloads and citations in hybrid journals. This study estimates author’s choice of open access using a probit model, and the results show that the cost of open access is an important factor in the decision. After a test for endogeneity of open access choice, the equation for downloads is estimated with the variables representing characteristics of articles and authors. The results of estimating downloads by ordinary least squares show that open access increases the number of downloads in hybrid journals. On the other hand, from citation estimations using a negative binominal model, this study found that the effect of open access on the number of citations differs among hybrid journals. It is a good practice for authors to consider a balance between article processing charges and the benefits that will be gained from open access when deciding whether to provide open access.
Open Access Determinants and the Effect on Article Performance, International Journal of Business and Economics Research.
Vol. 6, No. 6,
2017, pp. 145-152.
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Davis, P. M. (2011). Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing. The FASEB Journal, 25 (7), 2129–2134.
McCabe, M. J. & Snyder, C. M. (2014). Identifying the effect of open access on citations using a panel of science journals. Economic Inquiry, 52 (4), 1284–1300.
Lawrence, S. (2001). Online or invisible? Nature, 411 (6837), 521.
Antelman, K. (2004). Do open-access articles have a greater research impact? College & Research Libraries News, 65 (5), 372–382.
Lansingh, V. C. & Carter, M. J. (2009). Does open access in ophthalmology affect how articles are subsequently cited research? Ophthalmology, 116 (8), 1425–1431.
Eysenbach G. (2006). Citation advantage of open access articles. PLoS Biology, 4 (5) http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157 (last access on 1 March 2017).
Frandsen T. F. (2009). The integration of open access journals in the scholarly communication system: Three science fields. Information Processing and Management, 45 (1), 131–141.
Davis, P. M. (2009). Author-choice open-access publishing in the biological and medical literature: A citation analysis,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (1), 3–8.
Sotudeh, H., Ghasempour, Z., & Yaghtin, M. (2015). The citation advantage of author-pays model: the case of Springer and Elsevier OA journals. Scientometrics, 104 (2), 581–608.
Wray, K. B. (2016). No new evidence for a citation benefit for author-pay open access publications in the social science and humanities. Scientometrics, 106 (3), 1031–1035.
Wang, X., Liu, C., Mao, W., & Fang, Z. (2015). The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention. Scientometrics, 103 (2), 555–564.
Moed, H. F. (2005). Statistical relationships between downloads and citations at the level of individual documents within a single journal. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56 (10), 1088–1097.
Watson, A. B. (2009). Comparing citations and downloads for individual articles. Journal of Vision, 9 (4), 1–4.
Müller-Langer, F. & Watt, R. (2014). The hybrid open access citation advantage: How many more cites is a $3000 fee buying you? Munich Personal RePEc Archive, Paper No. 61801, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/61801/ (last accessed 20 March 2017).
Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1986). Econometric models based on count data: Comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1 (1), 29–53.