Trade Potential and Efficiency of the Countries Along the B&R: Based on Trade Diversification, Concentration and Complementarity
Journal of World Economic Research
Volume 7, Issue 2, June 2018, Pages: 44-51
Received: Mar. 30, 2018;
Accepted: Apr. 27, 2018;
Published: May 18, 2018
Views 1054 Downloads 97
Li Kexin, Department of International Trade, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China
Follow on us
The bilateral trade flow data in this paper is a collection of the 35 countries along "The Belt and Road" from 1995 to 2014. After getting the national trade efficiency and trade potential estimation, heterogeneous panel cointegration estimation methods (FMOLS and PDOLS) are used to analyze the influencing factors of trade efficiency and trade potential from three aspects: trade diversification, trade concentration and trade complementarity index. The lower the degree of trade diversification and the higher the degree of trade centralization are, the greater the potential of the country's trade is；the lower the degree of trade diversification and the higher the degree of trade centralization are, the more trade efficiency of the country is; for the bilateral trade volume, the higher the degree of trade complementarity between the two countries is, the greater the trade potential and trade efficiency between them is.
Trade Potential, Trade Efficiency, Trade Diversification, Trade Concentration, Trade Complementarity
To cite this article
Trade Potential and Efficiency of the Countries Along the B&R: Based on Trade Diversification, Concentration and Complementarity, Journal of World Economic Research.
Vol. 7, No. 2,
2018, pp. 44-51.
Copyright © 2018 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Armstrong S P, Drysdale P, Kalirajan K. Asian Trade Structures and Trade Potential: An Initial Analysis of South and East Asian Trade [J]. Eaber Working Papers, 2011, 35(7):644-653.
Baldwin R E. Towards an Integrated Europe [J]. International Affairs, 1994, 70(4):806.
Battese G E, Broca S S. Functional Forms of Stochastic Frontier Production Functions and Models for Technical Inefficiency Effects: A Comparative Study for Wheat Farmers in Pakistan [J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 1997, 8(4):395-414.
Battese G E, Corra G S. Estimation of a Production Frontier Model: With Application to the Pastoral Zone of Eastern Australia [J]. Australian Journal of Agricultural & Resource Economics, 1977, 21(3):169-179.
Chen L, Lombaerde P D, Cuyvers L. Markets Matter: The Potential of Intra-Regional Trade in ASEAN and Its Implications for Asian Regionalism [J]. Asian Economic Papers, 2017, 16(2):1-19.
Chuanglian Chen. Factors of Global trade efficiency and trade potential and influence analysis [J]. International Trade Issues, 2016, (07): 27-39.
Geda A, Seid E H. The potential for internal trade and regional integration in Africa [J]. Journal of African Trade, 2015, 2(1-2):19-50.
K. Kalirajan. Stochastic varying coefficients gravity model: An application in trade analysis [J]. Journal of Applied Statistics, 1999, 26(2):185-193.
Kao C, Chiang M H. On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data [J]. Advances in Econometrics, 1999, 15(1):109--141.
Mehchy Z, Nasser R, Schiffbauer M. Trade determinants and potential of Syria: using a gravity model ‘with an estimation of the Syrian crisis’ impact on exports’ [J]. Middle East Development Journal, 2015, 7(2):226-251.
Nilsson L. Trade integration and the EU economic membership criteria [J]. European Journal of Political Economy, 2000, 16(4):807-827.
Péridy N. Towards a New Trade Policy Between the USA and Middle-East Countries: Estimating Trade Resistance and Export Potential [J]. World Economy, 2010, 28(4):491-518.
Rahman M M. Australia's global trade potential: evidence from the gravity model analysis [J]. International Journal of Business Research, 2010, 10(:2).